youve not disproved what I stated
Angela Rayner
- Thread starter transam
- Start date
It's the other way around, actually.
Some architects are better (more building savvy) than others. Some are just plain useless.
hows that Rwanda scheme coming along
a tax adviser says:
Tax adviser Mr McCann said: "I don't think there's any credible case to be made that she's deliberately evaded tax. I don't see that as likely.
"Worst case scenario is that she didn't realise it. She wasn't Angela Rayner, deputy leader of the Labour Party, she was a care worker. These rules are very complicated."
He points out that mistakes can be remedied with HMRC within four years so it's now out of time - although she could choose to pay money back if found to owe anything.
oh dear, gasbag says its not out of time, tax advisor says it is
news.sky.com
Tax adviser Mr McCann said: "I don't think there's any credible case to be made that she's deliberately evaded tax. I don't see that as likely.
"Worst case scenario is that she didn't realise it. She wasn't Angela Rayner, deputy leader of the Labour Party, she was a care worker. These rules are very complicated."
He points out that mistakes can be remedied with HMRC within four years so it's now out of time - although she could choose to pay money back if found to owe anything.
oh dear, gasbag says its not out of time, tax advisor says it is
Angela Rayner's tax affairs - a smear or a real trust problem for Labour?
Labour's deputy leader has branded the story a "stream of smears", but the Conservatives will be keeping the pressure on to reveal more details, and Labour will have to decide whether to bow to that pressure.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
a tax adviser says:
Tax adviser Mr McCann said: "I don't think there's any credible case to be made that she's deliberately evaded tax. I don't see that as likely.
"Worst case scenario is that she didn't realise it. She wasn't Angela Rayner, deputy leader of the Labour Party, she was a care worker. These rules are very complicated."
He points out that mistakes can be remedied with HMRC within four years so it's now out of time - although she could choose to pay money back if found to owe anything.
oh dear, gasbag says its not out of time, tax advisor says it is
Angela Rayner's tax affairs - a smear or a real trust problem for Labour?
Labour's deputy leader has branded the story a "stream of smears", but the Conservatives will be keeping the pressure on to reveal more details, and Labour will have to decide whether to bow to that pressure.
Its not true.
She sold her house in March 2015
She became an MP in May 2015.
Her Liability to pay capital gains on the property was while she was an MP.
and to correct the above:
HMRC investigation time limit is 4 years if an innocent error is suspected; where mistakes in tax returns are deemed careless or negligent, the window extends to 6 years. Suspicion of deliberate tax evasion warrants an investigation period of 20 years. and of course there is no statute of limitation on criminal prosecutions.
Notchy 0 gassy 1.
Its out of time for her to pay the tax, not for HMRC to come after her.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Are you saying she deliberately evaded tax liabilities?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
I'm saying she was an MP when she had the obligation to pay the tax.
My view of if it was deliberate or not is irrelevant, her story doesn't stack up. I personally think it was an oversight/misunderstanding.
Few people consider the financial/tax consequences of getting married - me included
My view of if it was deliberate or not is irrelevant, her story doesn't stack up. I personally think it was an oversight/misunderstanding.
Few people consider the financial/tax consequences of getting married - me included
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Not what I asked.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
No is my answer.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 803
- Country
You are not actually saying anything. Certainly not to dispute what the specialist tax adviser said.I'm saying she was an MP when she had the obligation to pay the tax.
My view of if it was deliberate or not is irrelevant, her story doesn't stack up. I personally think it was an oversight/misunderstanding.
Few people consider the financial/tax consequences of getting married - me included
Are you now a tax advisor specialist too? Another string to add to your world class CV. Really don't understand why you are on a diy forum with all that under your belt.
I don't know much about capital gains tax. So can you just clarify the process for me.
The tax liability is for the 2014-2015 tax year? And does that then go on the tax return, which has to be done by January 2016. What questions are on that form which might be relevant to her. Does it, for instance, ask whether you have sold a property and, if so, was it your main residence.
Its not true.
She sold her house in March 2015
She became an MP in May 2015.
Her Liability to pay capital gains on the property was while she was an MP.
and to correct the above:
HMRC investigation time limit is 4 years if an innocent error is suspected; where mistakes in tax returns are deemed careless or negligent, the window extends to 6 years. Suspicion of deliberate tax evasion warrants an investigation period of 20 years. and of course there is no statute of limitation on criminal prosecutions.
Notchy 0 gassy 1.
It’s out of time for her to pay the tax, not for HMRC to come after her.
You are contradicting yourself
You said
And you said
An oversight / misunderstanding is an innocent error
It is not:
Notchie 8 nil
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
I'm not disagreeing with the advisor. He has been misquoted. He has not said the time limit for HMRC to come after her has expired. It hasn't. The time limit for her to declare the unpaid tax has expired.
The issue, is not how much she owes, not if she did it deliberately, but the hypocrisy of denying wrong doing, while at the same time being a fog horn for other's tax misdemeanours.
This article sums it up well..
www.standard.co.uk
The issue, is not how much she owes, not if she did it deliberately, but the hypocrisy of denying wrong doing, while at the same time being a fog horn for other's tax misdemeanours.
This article sums it up well..
I admire Labour's Angela Rayner but this tax business stinks
It’s hard not to admire Angela Rayner. Her backstory is almost cinematic – bullied kid growing up poor in Stockport, Manchester, told she would never amount to anything, illiterate mentally ill mother who she cared for from the age of ten. Pregnant at 16, deputy leader of the Labour Party by 40.
www.standard.co.uk
Standard CGT yes, but CGT derived from the disposal of property is due within 60 days. I suspect she wasn't subject to self assessment at the time, not that its relevant.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
notchy joins carman in the hard of thinking club.
read the tax book ffs.