What was the reason then
Anti vaxers will be feeling smug
- Thread starter lostinthelight
- Start date
- Status
I note you are engaging in childish pedantry rather than addressing the important point about only people at risk are being offered the vaccine
poor gas the angry anti vaxxer, wrong again
for exactly the reason you pointed out earlier: Omicron is mild so risk is lower
as you well know
They (antivaxx morons) are also scared of needles. Poor lambs.
nothing pedantry at all just pointing out your constant inability to tell the truth when you type absolute nonsense
i would imagine your not adverse to a prick or two
The vast, vast majority of people who are labelled as anti-vaxxers, have had vaccines and used pharmaceuticals in their life. But instead they are all thrown into one box as quacks who use voodoo instead.
Yes, there are grifters on the anti-Covid vaccine bandwagon but there are in every part of life. Whether pro or against. That doesn't mean you should just accept anyone's view as gospel.
The stats from govts already showed the likelihood of dying from CV-19 was next to nothing. Did the media hype the scare? Absolutely. You're not being honest if you say any different. The same media, years before, exposed how the pharmaceutical companies had tried to get the public into Swine flu shots. Were they cranks then?
The original claim was that the vaccines stopped you getting Covid and you only needed two shots. This then changed to:
- it doesn't stop you getting Covid but stops you passing it on
- It doesn't stop you passing it on either
- You now need 3 shots
- You now need 4 shots
- You now need to continue having shots
I have experience with two relatives who had problems after the vaccine. The NHS didn't even want to know. So any stats out there claiming to take side effects into account is more than questionable.
I will stick my neck out and say most people vaccinated likely won't have issues but a sizeable amount will and it's being underreported. Also, there is no need for these vaccines unless you're in a very small group of people. Even then it's dubious if it has any real benefit for most if at all.
Yes, there are grifters on the anti-Covid vaccine bandwagon but there are in every part of life. Whether pro or against. That doesn't mean you should just accept anyone's view as gospel.
The stats from govts already showed the likelihood of dying from CV-19 was next to nothing. Did the media hype the scare? Absolutely. You're not being honest if you say any different. The same media, years before, exposed how the pharmaceutical companies had tried to get the public into Swine flu shots. Were they cranks then?
The original claim was that the vaccines stopped you getting Covid and you only needed two shots. This then changed to:
- it doesn't stop you getting Covid but stops you passing it on
- It doesn't stop you passing it on either
- You now need 3 shots
- You now need 4 shots
- You now need to continue having shots
I have experience with two relatives who had problems after the vaccine. The NHS didn't even want to know. So any stats out there claiming to take side effects into account is more than questionable.
I will stick my neck out and say most people vaccinated likely won't have issues but a sizeable amount will and it's being underreported. Also, there is no need for these vaccines unless you're in a very small group of people. Even then it's dubious if it has any real benefit for most if at all.
1 in a hundred really when about 60 in a hundred didnt even know they had it so that figure is way out
Childish but I will not bite as I can see and have seen this is your and your mates tactic to get threads that you don't like shut down and removed, you just start with the name calling in the hope of a response and for it to escalate.
And for the record I had the vax - but I was not given a choice I was forced to.
D
Deleted member 221031
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 43,322
- Reaction score
- 2,758
- Country
if you read the thread i was quoting notch
- Status