Being a Jew illegal.. sometimes

motorbiking said:
Nothing suggest anything remotely close to a breach of the peace.

The officer made a mistake, he has apologised for his offensive remarks. He should not be punished.

The issues are the impact of weekly protest about something that nobody in the UK can do anything about. It is costing a fortune, causing hatred towards jews and causes a huge disruption.
Click to expand...
If you don't like the right to protest then that's fine, shows a lack of appreciation of our traditional rights but that's your opinion.

It'd be more convincing if you weren't using an obvious troll to try to make your point.
 
motorbiking said:
Well he could have walked across the road with Falter, there and then and this wouldn't have even made the headlines.
Click to expand...
That's not practical. He didn't trust Falter and so 'escorting' him across there would have been stupidly risky.

You keep insisting that he didn't do the right thing, why do you think the Met commissioner praised him so highly?
 
IT Minion said:
If you don't like the right to protest then that's fine, shows a lack of appreciation of our traditional rights but that's your opinion.

It'd be more convincing if you weren't using an obvious troll to try to make your point.
Click to expand...
I’m fine with people protesting, not fine when it causes massive disruption to everyone else.

But above all it will achieve absolutely nothing.

This weekly event is costing a fortune, causing massive disruption and entrenching hatred towards others.

It’s time sensible restrictions were put in place.
 
motorbiking said:
I’m fine with people protesting, not fine when it causes massive disruption to everyone else.

But above all it will achieve absolutely nothing.

This weekly event is costing a fortune, causing massive disruption and entrenching hatred towards others.

It’s time sensible restrictions were put in place.
Click to expand...
So some protests are OK, but some aren't.

Now, how do we differentiate to allow those that you approve of but not those that you don't?

Stop them all ?

The point of protesting is to show support and bring attention to (insert protest and reason in here). Doesn't mean everybody has to agree, or disagree. But it's an important right .
 
Do you see the difference between a single protest and a weekly protest?
Do you understand the disruption caused by one vs the other?
Are you aware that we already have a perfectly acceptable framework for placing restrictions?
Do you dispute that many of these protestors are showing hatred to others?

Why should my right to protest trump your right to go about your lawful business
 
motorbiking said:
Do you see the difference between a single protest and a weekly protest?
Click to expand...
Keeps the attention up rather than just a 1 off event that gets forgootten about the week after maybe
motorbiking said:
Do you understand the disruption caused by one vs the other?
Click to expand...
They all cause disturbance. maybe to the same people, maybe to different people
motorbiking said:
Are you aware that we already have a perfectly acceptable framework for placing restrictions?
Click to expand...
Where is the issue then
motorbiking said:
Do you dispute that many of these protestors are showing hatred to others?
Click to expand...
At which protest specifically do you mean. or more than 1 protest? Did you mean the St georges day event?
motorbiking said:
Why should my right to protest trump your right to go about your lawful business
Click to expand...
Your right to protest may impinge on my day. probably the point of the protest, to draw attention to something.

Want to cancel some, but not all ? I see that as wrong.
Want to cancel them all? I see that as wrong
 
motorbiking said:
You seem to be agreeing that sensible restrictions are needed.
Click to expand...
Of course sensible restrictions are needed overall. As happens already.

I also agree with the rights for protests to be allowed whenever possible.

I don't agree with restricting some and not others like you seem to.
 
I have not suggested some are restricted and not others, I have suggested that when a protest is a weekly event, it should not be granted the same flexibility as a one time event.

It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that a weekly protest is vastly more disruptive and costly than a one time event.

It is time for some sensible restriction to be put in place, to allow others to enjoy their freedom.
 
motorbiking said:
It is time for some sensible restriction to be put in place, to allow others to enjoy their freedom.
Click to expand...

You mean the Jewish provocateur should have been detained to prevent him trying to disrupt the peace march.

Who could have seen that coming?
 
What lawful basis do you have for detaining him, other than the fact he is a jew?
 
And you seem to have conviently missed a previous screen gab from the peaceful demonstration that supported the destruction of Israel and the killing of all Jews. But that not part of the narrative is it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top