Climbing a war memorial - not a crime

gant said:
You misrepresenting what I said is more proof if proof was needed that your not a trustworthy individual to have an open and honest debate.
Click to expand...
gant said:
Er Murphy, why would I join in a debate with you when I've just said your not a well rounded enough debater.
Click to expand...
It's abundantly clear that you don't join in a debate. You've just admitted it. Your reasons, or lack of, are irrelevant.
 
noseall said:
Does that have any relevance with someone (peacefully) climbing onto a structure? Bizarre post.
Click to expand...
Didn't that singer Brian Ferry's son get nicked for climbing all over a statue in some riot or another? He was a public schooled twaaat.
 
gant said:
More obfuscation of the point I made.
Click to expand...
You admitted you don't join in the debate. Either that or you admitted you don't have an honest and open debate.
gant said:
You misrepresenting what I said is more proof if proof was needed that your not a trustworthy individual to have an open and honest debate.
Click to expand...
But you don't know the reason why not. You asked Murphy for the reason.
gant said:
Er Murphy, why would I join in a debate with you when I've just said your not a well rounded enough debater.
Click to expand...
 
The Tories softened the Public Order Act in 2014, because plod were abusing the intent. Met police, think they got the Home Secretary sacked and are drunk on the power. They are trying to get the power back. The powers they have are easily sufficient.

Roy Bloom said:
I'm sure the head of the Met has plenty of well-informed advice available to him.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you'd like to read sec 5 of the Public order act, the charging standard and the case law and tell me where there is insufficient power to act when faced with such disorderly behaviour likely to cause alarm or distress?
 
motorbiking said:
The powers they have are easily sufficient.
Click to expand...
They disagree, apparently.
But as you know better than them, I suggest you write to them and tell them.

motorbiking said:
Perhaps you'd like to read sec 5 of the Public order act, the charging standard and the case law and tell me where there is insufficient power to act when faced with such disorderly behaviour likely to cause alarm or distress?
Click to expand...
Not particulalry, I'll take the Head of the Met's word.
Perhaps in his opinion, there was no risk of alarm or distress.
 
Roy Bloom said:
You admitted you don't join in the debate. Either that or you admitted you don't have an honest and open debate.

But you don't know the reason why not. You asked Murphy for the reason.
Click to expand...
Do you think Murphy exists?
 
Roy Bloom said:
They disagree, apparently.
But as you know better than them, I suggest you write to them and tell them.


Not particulalry, I'll take the Head of the Met's word.
Perhaps in his opinion, there was no risk of alarm or distress.
Click to expand...
I have no need, the government, home office, various MPs who are also lawyers and other lawyers have all pointed him in the right place.
 
I wonder what the protestors though they would achieve by climbing a monument....A they seem to have achieved is annoy the public and make then unsympathetic to the cause.

Personally the large protest last Saturday would've achieved more had they aworn s poppy in solidarity
 
Notch7 said:
They aren't biased.

If you think they please provide the evidence
Click to expand...
Nothing to do with plod, that one, perverse jury, particularly since the boss of XR was found guilty of doing the same. I bet she's p***d
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top