COVID vaccines and heart attack risk revealed

Status
Not open for further replies.
As always those who are unwilling/unable to question the 'official line' drag out that old 'conspiracy theory' label...

But there's plenty of 'conspiracy theories' out there that have been proven to be true ;)
 
Is that aveatry I hear speaking.....


Stick to trying to brainwash gullible thickos, boyo. Rational folk have no interest in your tiresome bullshít.
Touchy touchy school girl me thinks. Carry on happily skipping into the sunset, -- BOYO
Cary on believing your conspiracy theories like a gullible fool. Nobody cares.
What is so conspiratorial about saying that the OFNS has changed the way they record excess deaths - being told I made it up but then me proving what I said to be correct. The conspiracy is the denial and the cover-ups and the goalposts on wheels.
 
As always those who are unwilling/unable to question the 'official line' drag out that old 'conspiracy theory' label...
I question it all the time. What specifically is wrong with the new methodology?
 
As always those who are unwilling/unable to question the 'official line' drag out that old 'conspiracy theory' label...

But there's plenty of 'conspiracy theories' out there that have been proven to be true ;)
I can't understand this bowing down to things like this on pat, surely its in everyone's interest to question the governments line, rather than this roll over and have you tummy tickled by a load of charletons who go under the description of 'government'
 
surely its in everyone's interest to question the governments line,

Absolutely agree; and, as far as I can see, others agree with this too.

Where they differ from you is that they do the questioning and, if it comes back as coherent and valid, they accept it and move on.
 
3 years this March since I had my first (AZ) Covid jab. Still no hairs growing from the palms of my hands. :unsure:

Stupid antivaxxers
Never had any of the cocktail of vaccines...

Never really bothered about the OTT measures put in place...

Apparently I should have been very ill or dead...

And according to statistics I should have known someone who suffered the same 'fate'...

Funnily enough none of that occurred...

Why is that, stupid jab junkies?
 
Absolutely agree; and, as far as I can see, others agree with this too.

Where they differ from you is that they do the questioning and, if it comes back as coherent and valid, they accept it and move on.
Define 'coherent and valid'...

Especially as the goalposts are always shifting :rolleyes:

But back to the 'conspiracy theory' bit...

"A retired judge has sparked fury by calling on the Hillsborough families to drop their "conspiracy theories" and behave more like the relatives of victims of the Bradford City stadium disaster.

Sir Oliver Popplewell, who chaired the public inquiry into the 1985 fire at the Valley Parade stadium, which killed 56 people, called on the Liverpool families to look at the "quiet dignity and great courage" that relatives of the Bradford victims have shown in the years following the tragedy.

He made the comments in a letter to the Times following the House of Commons debate calling for all the cabinet papers on Hillsborough to be released.

He wrote: "The citizens of Bradford behaved with quiet dignity and great courage. They did not harbour conspiracy theories. They did not seek endless further inquiries. They buried their dead, comforted the bereaved and succoured the injured. They organised a sensible compensation scheme and moved on"

How did that 'conspiracy theory turn out?

Would the truth have been uncovered if they had just 'moved on'?

And were there 'coherent and valid' replies at the time in your opinion?
 
Define 'coherent and valid'...

Especially as the goalposts are always shifting :rolleyes:

But back to the 'conspiracy bit...

"A retired judge has sparked fury by calling on the Hillsborough families to drop their "conspiracy theories" and behave more like the relatives of victims of the Bradford City stadium disaster.

Sir Oliver Popplewell, who chaired the public inquiry into the 1985 fire at the Valley Parade stadium, which killed 56 people, called on the Liverpool families to look at the "quiet dignity and great courage" that relatives of the Bradford victims have shown in the years following the tragedy.

He made the comments in a letter to the Times following the House of Commons debate calling for all the cabinet papers on Hillsborough to be released.

He wrote: "The citizens of Bradford behaved with quiet dignity and great courage. They did not harbour conspiracy theories. They did not seek endless further inquiries. They buried their dead, comforted the bereaved and succoured the injured. They organised a sensible compensation scheme and moved on"

How did that 'conspiracy theory turn out?

Would the truth have been uncovered if they had just 'moved on'?


Define "always".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top