- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
He did. He presumably thought the fire gave him enough reason to do it.So why didn't the owner just demolish it?
The ones around me had the same MO. Fire at night making it "structurally unsound", demolished by sunrise as an act of protecting the public.
The council did dig their heels in and he was prosecuted for some planning/building offence. The council then refused all new proposals, the owner went bust, and we have had an eyesore of a gap site for the last 20 years.