So we've just had 2 quotes for new boiler installations, the price isn't the issue as such but the opinions between both engineers who are locally run, and have been around for 20+ years.
Our house is a 3 bed detached and about 890 sqft, so not a huge house really, 4 radiators downstairs 4 upstairs and one bathroom.
We currently have a very old floor standing glowworm heat only boiler under the stairs (at least 25 years old), and a cylinder and tank in the loft (which are quite new by the looks of it... we have only just bought the place).
The first engineer advised due to the size of the house we should keep the gravity fed system and stick with a heat only boiler but obviously get a new one installed, we also wanted to move the boiler upstairs into the airing cupboard but he advised to leave it where it is.
The next engineer advised he was talking bullsh*t and rather didnt want the hassle of removing the tanks and boiler or didn't know an awful lot. He advised we should get rid of the tank considering theres only 2 of us with 1 bathroom which won't change and that even with a couple of children it wouldnt be an issue. He advised having tanks in the loft is a risk in itself and gthat a combi boiler would be just as good if not better. He also said that moving the boiler is perfectly fine it's just a bit more work, but gives us more space. The 2nd guy also quoted us better, including more radiators and a full new pipe system so we didnt have to worry about the pressure from the new boiler in the old pipes.
As we mentioned price isn't a huge issue but I was wondering if anyone could advise on who is in the right here?
The first guy also told us to block up the airvents in the house, which seemed a bit odd... I could understand new builds not needing airvents nowadays but a house that was built in 1925 i'd expect it would need some decent circulation.
Our house is a 3 bed detached and about 890 sqft, so not a huge house really, 4 radiators downstairs 4 upstairs and one bathroom.
We currently have a very old floor standing glowworm heat only boiler under the stairs (at least 25 years old), and a cylinder and tank in the loft (which are quite new by the looks of it... we have only just bought the place).
The first engineer advised due to the size of the house we should keep the gravity fed system and stick with a heat only boiler but obviously get a new one installed, we also wanted to move the boiler upstairs into the airing cupboard but he advised to leave it where it is.
The next engineer advised he was talking bullsh*t and rather didnt want the hassle of removing the tanks and boiler or didn't know an awful lot. He advised we should get rid of the tank considering theres only 2 of us with 1 bathroom which won't change and that even with a couple of children it wouldnt be an issue. He advised having tanks in the loft is a risk in itself and gthat a combi boiler would be just as good if not better. He also said that moving the boiler is perfectly fine it's just a bit more work, but gives us more space. The 2nd guy also quoted us better, including more radiators and a full new pipe system so we didnt have to worry about the pressure from the new boiler in the old pipes.
As we mentioned price isn't a huge issue but I was wondering if anyone could advise on who is in the right here?
The first guy also told us to block up the airvents in the house, which seemed a bit odd... I could understand new builds not needing airvents nowadays but a house that was built in 1925 i'd expect it would need some decent circulation.