GB News

I would be quite happy to allow controlled immigration to people that have jobs lined up or skills that we want and i welcome the Hong Kong and Ukraine refugees with open arms.

What really boils my p!ss is old people not being able to afford to turn on their heating or homeless people living on the streets when we are funding thousands of asylum claimants to live in hotels who've illegally crossed the channel in small boats.
Blame your government.

They tried brexit, and now they have control of our borders.
 
GB news mention this British Brexit success story?
10666CE8-760A-49B5-BD81-D52D891A4DAF.png
 
What really boils my p!ss is old people not being able to afford to turn on their heating or homeless people living on the streets when we are funding thousands of asylum claimants to live in hotels who've illegally crossed the channel in small boats.

If you watched other news outlets you might find out that it isn't illegal either to cross the channel or to claim asylum in the UK. And that quite a few other European countries take more asylum claimants per capita than we do. Aren't you proud of us for doing our bit?
 
If you watched other news outlets you might find out that it isn't illegal either to cross the channel or to claim asylum in the UK. And that quite a few other European countries take more asylum claimants per capita than we do. Aren't you proud of us for doing our bit?
I’m aware of that argument. However, paying criminals to transport them across the channel to avoid border controls and then fraudulently claiming asylum or people trafficking makes them criminals in my eyes.
 
What really boils my p!ss is old people not being able to afford to turn on their heating or homeless people living on the streets when we are funding thousands of asylum claimants to live in hotels who've illegally crossed the channel in small boats

homelessness / heating costs is the result of political choice

we could also afford to fund asylum seekers if we wanted to


Why have tax payers been funding bogus PPE contracts?
 
I’m aware of that argument. However, paying criminals to transport them across the channel to avoid border controls and then fraudulently claiming asylum or people trafficking makes them criminals in my eyes.
They can't claim asylum until they cross the border and the majority of them are found to be genuinely eligible for asylum.

Imagine someone who does deserve asylum, should they be refused for taking a boat?
 
In other news, Mark Steyn might be leaving GB News. Apparently his bio has been scrubbed of any mention of a job there. The current theory is that GBNews think he's too toxic thanks to some of the Ofcom complaints.
 
He is off at the moment due to having a couple of heart attacks and being the chief instigator of getting ofcoms back up it wouldn't be a surprise.
Thought he was quite good at what he did but always thought he would be on borrowed time, a dumbed down Steyn would lose a lot of his appeal.
 
He is off at the moment due to having a couple of heart attacks and being the chief instigator of getting ofcoms back up it wouldn't be a surprise.
Thought he was quite good at what he did but always thought he would be on borrowed time, a dumbed down Steyn would lose a lot of his appeal.
Well informed for somebody who claims not to take much notice of GB news or any other media site.

What appeal would he lose if you don't watch him anyway?

No need to answer, it's obvious. 1 or more of your comments on the subject is, or was, incorrect.
 
See what I mean about asking questions a 10 year old would baulk at asking because they're so obvious.
Told you before about thinking before you post.
I'll answer your whack a mole question, it doesn't take hours and hours of watching someone for hours and hours to get the drift of what they're about, a person of a modicum of intelligence could tell you that.
 
See what I mean about asking questions a 10 year old would baulk at asking because they're so obvious.
Told you before about thinking before you post.
I'll answer your whack a mole question, it doesn't take hours and hours of watching someone for hours and hours to get the drift of what they're about, a person of a modicum of intelligence could tell you that.
so you do watch gb news. thought so.
 
I thought I said I take a passing interest along with other broadcasters, so I suppose that makes you right.
You on the other hand didn't know they an alternative opinion and then later revealed did watch some of it.
Your a bit all over the place.
 
I thought I said I take a passing interest along with other broadcasters, so I suppose that makes you right.
You on the other hand didn't know they an alternative opinion and then later revealed did watch some of it.
Your a bit all over the place.
you're right.

I have watched it. I don't watch it now and wont. Because....

they NEVER have any balanced arguments. Ultraright wing horse feed
 
Back
Top