I have no idea to what extent he takes responsibility for the well-being of them all
Do you?
Do you seriously imagine that a parent's responsibility is limited to arranging partial funding?
Is Stockton on Tees a ****hole?
- Thread starter fillyboy
- Start date
I have no idea to what extent he takes responsibility for the well-being of them all
Do you?
Do you seriously imagine that a parent's responsibility is limited to arranging partial funding?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
why did you mention him then?
I would have thought it was obvious - the last thing in his mind is "what could be the repercussions of my actions?"
I'm sure that's in every young person's mind before intercourse.
Because you advocated prospective parents asking themselves
You did not say that you only care about money, though it seems that's what you had in mind.
You did not say that you only care about money, though it seems that's what you had in mind.
Is that your observation? What sort of man is not thick then?
You could but you won’t - just like you wouldn’t post any pictures of those empty shelves you claimed were in your supermarket when I was posting pictures full ones in mine because you couldn’t and it would have shown your posts for what they were - just Brexit/Tory hating bulls hit.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
There is such a thing as contraception. Nobody is being a fun sponge.I'm sure that's in every young person's mind before intercourse.
Someone should have told Boris.
But he's no spring chicken, maybe he should ahve of it for himself.
If we thought that about a lot of life's big decisions, we wouldn't do it.
Getting married, Buying a house, Changing jobs, etc.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
I agree, but 10% more thinking and planning will help us all.
It is not reasonable for a person to assume they can have as many kids as they like and expect everyone else to fund them. We've all seen the tabloid stories of people who have never worked, but think it's their "human right" to have 10 kids and live in a free house with free money.
It's not prosperous, horse riding Tories who pick up the bill. We all do.
It is not reasonable for a person to assume they can have as many kids as they like and expect everyone else to fund them. We've all seen the tabloid stories of people who have never worked, but think it's their "human right" to have 10 kids and live in a free house with free money.
It's not prosperous, horse riding Tories who pick up the bill. We all do.
Have you met many people who sincerely believe that?
Obviously you shouldn't believe what you read in tabloids.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 803
- Country
And to consider whilst working full time, can I even afford to live. Luckily the state subsidises business and pays benefits to adults because wages aren't enough.
Is child allowance still paid too?
The issue is the cost of living, nothing more, no matter how you try and twist
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 803
- Country
How many are in that bracket, compared to in full employment and still needing benefits on top of wages.
Obviously they shouldn't even think about having children
Pictures of one supermarket on one occasion is not proof.
An image of an overflowing bin is not proof of a failing council.
If you think they are, well done you get to own yer own stupidity