I’ve never put anybody on ignore….whats the point, if you don’t want to debate with somebody, don’t respond
It must be pure hell for them….
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
It also greatly improves the signal to noise ratio.
You should learn to differentiate between noise and signal.
Then you can ignore the noise if you want to, (or play with it, if it amuses you), and pay attention to the signal.
You don't need to block out everything, because then you lose the signal as well.
I have lots of people on ignore, not to ignore them but to remind me that at some time they’ve been an R.Sole.
I would like to be able to put a comment next to some users that only I could read.
I suspect what you really mean is that they've had a different opinion to you.
Ask Santa for a pen and some paper.
Not necessarily. Having a different opinion and being an R.Sole are two different things.
Give us your definition of being an Rsole. Let us decide if your definition is accurate and appropriately applied,
Or if you conflate the two.
I’m not going to dance to your tune. I don’t need to add you to my ignore list to remind me what you are.
I used to have those on my ignore list as my signature. Because of that, I lost my 'privilege' to have a signature. I still can’t have a signature. Seems like some didn’t like it being advertised that they were being ignored. Trolls and the posts they generate equals hits for the site owners I imagine.
Last edited:
I'll have to assume that you can't or don't differentiate between those who are a genuine Rsole, and those with whose opinions you disagree.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
Why do you feel its your role to preach virtue to others?
Anyone who disagrees with you is a bigoted, prejudice, right wing racist etc. and yet you are complaining that people don't want to engage in debate.
Double standards don't you think?
Anyone who disagrees with you is a bigoted, prejudice, right wing racist etc. and yet you are complaining that people don't want to engage in debate.
Double standards don't you think?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
The fiasco saga continues. Interesting interview with Suella on R4 this morning.
Bibby Stockholm: Migrant barge faces legal challenge over fire safety
Firefighters have raised concerns about overcrowding and fire exit access on the Bibby Stockholm.
www.bbc.co.uk
In an interview with the BBC, the home secretary stepped up her attack on the European court of human rights (ECHR), calling it politicised and interventionist.
She also suggested the government would be prepared to pull out of the convention that governs the Strasbourg court if it blocked the Rwanda policy, despite there being opposition to such a move inside the cabinet.
Speaking to Mishal Husain on Radio 4’s Today programme, Braverman said: “If we are thwarted by the courts, or indeed by Strasbourg, then we will have to do whatever it takes, ultimately, to ensure that we can stop the boats.”
more stuff n' sense@the Grunaida
It seems Cruella has had her monthly hate hormone supplements all in one gulp and is fresh out of live mice for lunch.
She also suggested the government would be prepared to pull out of the convention that governs the Strasbourg court if it blocked the Rwanda policy, despite there being opposition to such a move inside the cabinet.
Speaking to Mishal Husain on Radio 4’s Today programme, Braverman said: “If we are thwarted by the courts, or indeed by Strasbourg, then we will have to do whatever it takes, ultimately, to ensure that we can stop the boats.”
more stuff n' sense@the Grunaida
It seems Cruella has had her monthly hate hormone supplements all in one gulp and is fresh out of live mice for lunch.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Mishal: Why has the new immigration act not actually been used to detain and deport anyone?
Suella: Because it hasn't completely come into force yet.
Mishal: But it was your new flagship policy? When will it be implemented?
Suella: When the Rwanda plan is deemed lawful and Strasbourg stop interfering.
Mishal: So it might never fully come in to force?
Suella: Erm....blame the Supreme Court and Strasbourg, not me.
Good old Suella...
Suella: Because it hasn't completely come into force yet.
Mishal: But it was your new flagship policy? When will it be implemented?
Suella: When the Rwanda plan is deemed lawful and Strasbourg stop interfering.
Mishal: So it might never fully come in to force?
Suella: Erm....blame the Supreme Court and Strasbourg, not me.
Good old Suella...
If they did withdraw from the ECHR, the Good Friday Agreement also fails.
Does The Good Friday Agreement Depend On The ECHR? - EachOther
The European Convention on Human Rights is enshrined in the Good Friday Agreement, the power-sharing arrangement in Northern Ireland.
eachother.org.uk
Could the government retain the ECHR for NI, and ignore it for England, Scotland and Wales?