- Joined
- 29 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
We built an extension on ground floor of a Victorian house. The extension is L shaped with a thin part connecting it to the existing structure. The roof is a green sedum roof, with a waterproofing membrane collecting all the rain water and channeling it to a pipe that goes through the ceiling and out in the area just by the connection between main house and extension. There were two professionals involved, a main builder who did everything except the roof and another one who did all the roof, and pipe. The roof guy left the pipe extending about 25cm from the house and when the builder finished the wall and render, he cut it close to the wall and created an angle connection to a vertical pipe taking the water down to the sewer.
Within a year after the construction we noticed damp patches on the wall very close to (just under) the pipe mentioned above. The builder came to see it and said that water was escaping from the corner connection so he glued it to create a seal. Soon after though the damp came back. We asked the roof guy, who said that the pipe should not have been cut short because water can travel back from the end of the pipe back into the wall, the safe distance being 5cm from the wall at a minimum, pointing the blame to the builder who should know better. The builder on the other hand said that he cut it 2cm outside the wall (although my wife remembers it being cut flush, not 2cm) and especially with the additional seal from the glue there shouldn't be any water coming in, and suggested that most likely there's a leak further upstream perhaps where the membrane leads to the pipe. The roof guy said that's impossible because there's a huge area of a complete seal of the membrane on both surfaces of the pipe. He quoted about £800 to remove the pipe and install a new one whose outlet sticks out the recommended amount from the wall(and of course recreating the seal with the membrane). In the absence of an agreement between the two on what's the fault and what needs done, and it seems they don't get along very well which makes communication difficult, and given that we can't have a continued leak, we feel trapped into paying that.
What I am not convinced of though is that even if best practice is indeed having the pipe extending by a lot from the wall, there must be a way to waterproof the wall if it stands out even a tiny bit. Either by having a fully sealed extension of the pipe, or sealing all the surrounding area, or something else. Surely it can't be that the solution is replacing the entire pipe?
I am trying to get both of them on site and discuss it and agree on something but I would like to gather some views and ideas on it beforehand.
Pictures are here: https://imgur.com/a/OTZs2xV
There are photos of the area in question, before, during, and after the works. You can see the pipe sticking out a lot before the wall render was applied, and now neatly (but potentially dangerously) tucked away in the L corner leading the water down. You can see the damp wall inside and some stains on the render outside. There's also a picture I took of the inside of the pipe from the front, as well as two photos from the other side (on the roof).
Any suggestions/thoughts welcome.
Within a year after the construction we noticed damp patches on the wall very close to (just under) the pipe mentioned above. The builder came to see it and said that water was escaping from the corner connection so he glued it to create a seal. Soon after though the damp came back. We asked the roof guy, who said that the pipe should not have been cut short because water can travel back from the end of the pipe back into the wall, the safe distance being 5cm from the wall at a minimum, pointing the blame to the builder who should know better. The builder on the other hand said that he cut it 2cm outside the wall (although my wife remembers it being cut flush, not 2cm) and especially with the additional seal from the glue there shouldn't be any water coming in, and suggested that most likely there's a leak further upstream perhaps where the membrane leads to the pipe. The roof guy said that's impossible because there's a huge area of a complete seal of the membrane on both surfaces of the pipe. He quoted about £800 to remove the pipe and install a new one whose outlet sticks out the recommended amount from the wall(and of course recreating the seal with the membrane). In the absence of an agreement between the two on what's the fault and what needs done, and it seems they don't get along very well which makes communication difficult, and given that we can't have a continued leak, we feel trapped into paying that.
What I am not convinced of though is that even if best practice is indeed having the pipe extending by a lot from the wall, there must be a way to waterproof the wall if it stands out even a tiny bit. Either by having a fully sealed extension of the pipe, or sealing all the surrounding area, or something else. Surely it can't be that the solution is replacing the entire pipe?
I am trying to get both of them on site and discuss it and agree on something but I would like to gather some views and ideas on it beforehand.
Pictures are here: https://imgur.com/a/OTZs2xV
There are photos of the area in question, before, during, and after the works. You can see the pipe sticking out a lot before the wall render was applied, and now neatly (but potentially dangerously) tucked away in the L corner leading the water down. You can see the damp wall inside and some stains on the render outside. There's also a picture I took of the inside of the pipe from the front, as well as two photos from the other side (on the roof).
Any suggestions/thoughts welcome.