Hi all,
I understand that a CH system requires that at least one radiator have no TRV to prevent the user from closing all valves, and overheating the system, but I have also read on this forum that the radiator lacking a TRV is typically placed near the thermostat (https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/why-1-radiator-without-trv.30297/).
Perhaps there's a sensible reason to do this in general but I suspect that there are good reasons not to place it near the thermostat.
The front of my house is typically a few degrees warmer than the rear due to a conservatory that is very lossy. The house was built 4 years ago and the conservatory (more like an extension with a glass ceiling than a proper conservatory) is part of the original design.
The thermostat is also in the front of the house and so is the TRV-less radiator.
It strikes me as odd because in a house with such a dramatic thermal imbalance I think it would have more sense for the TRV-less radiator to be at the cold end of the house.
The obvious issue with it's current placement is that despite my efforts to balance the normalise the temperature gradients by fully opening the radiators in the cold areas, and partially close the ones in the warm areas, the TRV-less radiator is disproportionately heating the small corridor where the thermostat is.
Inevitably that small volume of air gets warmed quickly (even though the TRV-less radiator is the only radiator in that zone), the thermostat switches off, and the cold part of the house remains cold.
My questions:
1) Is there any reason why I shouldn't remove a TRV from one of the radiators in the cold zone and fit it on the radiator near the thermostat?
If the TRV-radiator is part of the same circuit, I suspect that would be fine. But if it has it's own circuit that could cause overheating if all TRVs were closed.
2) Is it standard practice for the TRV-less radiator to be in it's own circuit?
Thanks.
I understand that a CH system requires that at least one radiator have no TRV to prevent the user from closing all valves, and overheating the system, but I have also read on this forum that the radiator lacking a TRV is typically placed near the thermostat (https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/why-1-radiator-without-trv.30297/).
Perhaps there's a sensible reason to do this in general but I suspect that there are good reasons not to place it near the thermostat.
The front of my house is typically a few degrees warmer than the rear due to a conservatory that is very lossy. The house was built 4 years ago and the conservatory (more like an extension with a glass ceiling than a proper conservatory) is part of the original design.
The thermostat is also in the front of the house and so is the TRV-less radiator.
It strikes me as odd because in a house with such a dramatic thermal imbalance I think it would have more sense for the TRV-less radiator to be at the cold end of the house.
The obvious issue with it's current placement is that despite my efforts to balance the normalise the temperature gradients by fully opening the radiators in the cold areas, and partially close the ones in the warm areas, the TRV-less radiator is disproportionately heating the small corridor where the thermostat is.
Inevitably that small volume of air gets warmed quickly (even though the TRV-less radiator is the only radiator in that zone), the thermostat switches off, and the cold part of the house remains cold.
My questions:
1) Is there any reason why I shouldn't remove a TRV from one of the radiators in the cold zone and fit it on the radiator near the thermostat?
If the TRV-radiator is part of the same circuit, I suspect that would be fine. But if it has it's own circuit that could cause overheating if all TRVs were closed.
2) Is it standard practice for the TRV-less radiator to be in it's own circuit?
Thanks.