Major Incident In Southport

[denso13]

One reason the name has been released could be due tp others mentioned on the web

“Continuing to prevent the full reporting has the disadvantage of allowing others to spread misinformation, in a vacuum,” Judge Menary said, according to the Press Association.

That and the fact he is 18 next week.

 

[JonathanM]

There are also still calls for another demo.

About what?

 

[ajohn]

About what?

The same lot as caused the riot, The BBC fact check people have been doings some social media post scanning. They showed one interesting example. It included a photo of the culprit but it was something else taken 2 years ago and not related in any fashion.

Starmer has been talking to the police. Sounds like he will use the same technique that was and is used on football hooligans and making sure that info gets to all policing areas. Facial recognition plus anything else worth considering.

The far right group mentioned. They got clever. Rather large demo in London and no problems. I assume they said no trouble please. The leader thanked the police for not interfering. Maybe plod should stir them up a bit.

 

[fixitflav]

We're not discussing the difference between 'denying' and 'policing'. We're discussing the difference between 'refuting'' and 'policing'.

What the hell are you talking about? "Refuting (or denying)" and policing are totally different concepts.

I'm sure you're able to imagine the typical actions required for the police 'to police'.

Yes, but your statement was still wrong. Seems like you don't understand grammar.

 

[Mrs Doubtfyre]

What the hell are you talking about? "Refuting (or denying)" and policing are totally different concepts.

Oh dear, time for me to remind you of the original discussion.
I said I refute the arguments.
You accused me of trying to police the forum.
I pointed out the difference between refuting and policing. (you introduced the irrelevant word 'denying')
I have no authority to 'police' the forum, but I do have the privilege of refuting the silly arguments.

Are you back up to speed now?

Yes, but your statement was still wrong. Seems like you don't understand grammar.

I must have overestimated your capability to imagine the actions required for the police to police a forum.
In future I will spell it out for you, so there will be no misunderstanding.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

He'll be 18 then when he goes to trial. If it's Murder, it's murder - mandatory life. It wont make much difference. Certainly not a binary difference.

Surely, given the seriousness of the crime, whether it's prison or a secure unit, he'll be locked up for life, as in life? There again, nothing would surprise me ...

 

[fixitflav]

Oh dear, time for me to remind you of the original discussion.
I said I refute the arguments.
You accused me of trying to police the forum.
I pointed out the difference between refuting and policing. (you introduced the irrelevant word 'denying')
I have no authority to 'police' the forum, but I do have the privilege of refuting the silly arguments.

Are you back up to speed now?


I must have overestimated your capability to imagine the actions required for the police to police a forum.
In future I will spell it out for you, so there will be no misunderstanding.

**** off you moron. I can't be bothered to read your nonsense.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

**** off you moron. I can't be bothered to read your nonsense.

They're best ignored, nothing more than a stirring troll ...

 

[Odds]

The suspect has been named now.

Axel Muganwa Rudakubana

I think I read he turns 18 next week.

View attachment 350851

Yes, the judge gave that as one of the reasons why he allowed the name to be given to the press...and to prevent a repeat of Farage whipping up another mob to go there. The youth has autism, so Mrs D. will no doubt be chuffed to be proven right in her speculation about mental health being an issue in this case.

 

[motorbiking]

Autism doesn’t provide a defence to murder.

 

[Odds]

Autism doesn’t provide a defence to murder.

Not saying it does, but all the back n' forth about mental health issues being a factor are, it seems, valid.

 

[Mrs Doubtfyre]

**** off you moron. I can't be bothered to read your nonsense.

Wow, another poster who puts endless thought and time into an intellectual response.
It's a shame it's not even original.

 

[JonathanM]

.

 

[Mottie]

The racist 'vigilante' right wing thugs also tend to be incredibly thick...

I recall a house being attacked in Portsmouth because the brainless mob couldn't differentiate between Pediatrician and Paedophile!

Then you are a gullible rumour spreading idiot.

Linky Linky

 

[Mrs Doubtfyre]

Yes, the judge gave that as one of the reasons why he allowed the name to be given to the press...and to prevent a repeat of Farage whipping up another mob to go there. The youth has autism, so Mrs D. will no doubt be chuffed to be proven right in her speculation about mental health being an issue in this case.

Impartial, dispassionate. I only hope my arguments were reasonable and unprejudiced.
Although I was concerned about the disinformation, and the fomenting of division.