Oil-filled radiator specifications: 'nominal heat output' versus 'rated power'

Joined
11 May 2004
Messages
237
Reaction score
9
Location
Hampshire
Country
United Kingdom
The technical data of a number of products (e.g. similar to https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/3120980.pdf) suggests the actual heat output is about half that of the headline rated figure (i.e. what looks good on the box).

That 650Watt rated item, for example, has a nominal of 0.3492kW, i.e. ~54%. A 2500Watt item has a nominal of only 0.9360kW, i.e. ~37%, which all seems a bit misrepresentation-y.

As the nominal is often given to 4 decimal places, there is presumably a good technical reason for knowing this level of precision.

Does this suggest, say, the mains power is half-wave rectified? Or is that due to an On/Off timer circuit (some kind of slow PWM). Or is it due to the internal cut-out?

I am guessing the heater element and mechanical gubbins is rated to the higher figure, and the complete product delivers the nominal.

Alternatively, this 2500W product only talks about heat output....
 
Answering my own question......these YT videos tell me all I need to know, and a lot more too about the fundamentally flawed design approach. There's an interesting improvement modification for those who are competent. My tri-wing Y-bit screwdrivers are on order for investigative purposes :cool:

Oil filled heaters: 600 watt heaters pretending to be 1500 watts
also

Basically the design approach relying on thermal cut-out switching (and cycling) is fraudulent IMHO, and these products (which are very generic) should be withdrawn until the design is improved.
 
Back
Top