Planning likely on a paddock?

[ymorph]

Hi all

We’re look to buy land and am confused about the difference in the regulations for agriculture land and a paddock. I know the general permitted development rules for agricultural land. My partner is a plantsman and wants to open a garden nursery and we want to live on the land. Is change of use and planning permission unlikely on land currently designated paddock land? Thanks for any help.

 

[JohnD]

Paddocks for ponies and horses are not considered to be agricultural land, because with very few exceptions the animals are not slaughtered for food or used to pull ploughs.

They are used for recreation. Some as pets.

 

[foxhole]

Maybe this applies?

Building Homes for Agricultural or Forestry Workers​

The NPPF acknowledges the need for an agricultural or forestry worker to live in a specific location in specific circumstances. There are various reasons why it might be necessary for such a worker to live on site, such as animal welfare which can constitute the very special circumstances required to allow a new home in the Green Belt.

However, using this exemption requires the production of credible evidence of the need for the worker to live on site as well as evidence that there is no other suitable accommodation nearby. Where a site is in close proximity to properties in other settlements, it can often be difficult to prove that no alternative exists.



Securing planning permission for your development in the Green Belt is certainly not a cakewalk, but equally if you approach it with eyes wide open and understand the risks and how to mitigate these then there is reason for optimism that you might be able to develop.

Having an experienced Planning Consultant by your side who understands the nuances of Green Belt planning policies as well as the idiosyncrasies of the local political landscape is vital and this should be your first port of call before engaging an Architect or other professionals on your project.