It was a good swerve.
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Draft Bill
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
The most up to date correct numbers are :
91,047 UK
115,078 France
158,000 seem to have gone missing to match the 3X claim. Might be why poor Zoe didn't finish her PhD in Lobbying.
91,047 UK
115,078 France
158,000 seem to have gone missing to match the 3X claim. Might be why poor Zoe didn't finish her PhD in Lobbying.
thats a graph showing legal routes.One source vs all source? Thats pathetic even from you. I also note its a GRANT rate.
She is wrong and we all know it.
She was trying to argue her lobbyist position that France has 3 X more people seeking its protection compared to the UK. i.e. they are already doing 3X more than us. Its nonsense.
We could have 500,000 and a 1% acceptance rate and that would not mean we lead Europe in protecting asylum claimants.
We do not include those coming via safe a legal routes in our stats. I've no idea if France has a similar policy.
from your source.
nothing to do with this debate.
Bit like you did when started going off at a tangent when you started going on about scrapyards, when it wasn't relevant to the point I was making. RolleyesDifferent argument.
We're discussing the accuracy and veracity of Zoe Gardner's testimony to H of C.
You want to discuss the morality of asylum seekers coming to UK.
No. It was a poor misogynistic swerve. MBK clearly despises women.
As much as Bloom? he'd have to go some.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
Noseall back from tugging himself off misunderstanding Zoe's "open to work" tag on her linkedin
Your 91,000 does not reflect the accurate numbers for boat arrivals. it's a grossly inflated figure.
Do I really need to remind you of the question yet again?
Zoe Gardner explains it slowly, eloquently and succintly.
The question was, "of the asylum seekers in Calais, why do they not claim in France, italy, Spain or Greece?
Another sad ad hominem attack from mototbiking. His mask hasn't slipped, it's fallen through the cracks in the floorboards.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
Trim the data as you like, you have no way to compare boat arrivals in the UK with Asylum claimants in France.
3 x 91,047 ≠ 115,078
3 x 91,047 ≠ 115,078
from Eurostat:
France 2022, 156,103 persons were registered as asylum seekers by the Ministry of Interior
Statistics - Asylum Information Database | European Council on Refugees and Exiles
Overview of statistical practice In France, detailed statistics on asylum applications and first instance decisions are published annually by the Office of Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) in its activity reports. The next OFPRA Activity Report will be published in spring...
asylumineurope.org
That's becasue asylum seekers to France do not arrive by boat. They travel overland. That's not a possible route for asylum seekers to get to UK.
Do I really need to remind you of the question put to Zoe, yet again?
You certainly are with spurious bar charts
2022: 115,000 to France, 40,000 boat arrival applications to UK. That's as good as 3X.
You are talking about initial acceptance.