Hi all,
Just bought an old house that needs renovation, as always though going it on a budget leads so questions like this.
The entire house is covered in wall paper that looks far from new. I’m on a timescale with this so would like your help in weighing up whether I:
a) pay someone to strip the wall paper and pray the plaster underneath is still sound, ideally then supporting just a skim to freshen up. Not forgetting I might do this only to find the plaster is shot and still needs option b..
b) pay someone to take it back to brick entirely which I’ve no doubt is quicker than stripping wall paper, but face a larger bill for replastering.
With this in mind, picture what you consider an average 3 bed house. As a % of time, how much more time does replastering take vs reskimming?
For example, if you’d say it takes 5 days to re-skim, is it 10+ equivalent to replaster so 100% more effort, or more/less?
Thanks!
Just bought an old house that needs renovation, as always though going it on a budget leads so questions like this.
The entire house is covered in wall paper that looks far from new. I’m on a timescale with this so would like your help in weighing up whether I:
a) pay someone to strip the wall paper and pray the plaster underneath is still sound, ideally then supporting just a skim to freshen up. Not forgetting I might do this only to find the plaster is shot and still needs option b..
b) pay someone to take it back to brick entirely which I’ve no doubt is quicker than stripping wall paper, but face a larger bill for replastering.
With this in mind, picture what you consider an average 3 bed house. As a % of time, how much more time does replastering take vs reskimming?
For example, if you’d say it takes 5 days to re-skim, is it 10+ equivalent to replaster so 100% more effort, or more/less?
Thanks!