Hi all, we’ve recently had planning permission approved and now trying to finalise our internal layout before getting in builders for quote. Budget is going to be tight, so one of the key considerations is weighing up whether to do more structural works or make the extension bigger, and looking to understand whether either is likely to be significantly more expensive than the other…
We have permission to go out 4.5m (on a 5.5m width) and this would be the preference (Option 1 below), but budget is a major factor and in theory for what we want to achieve (7.5m x 5.5m open plan space) we could get away with only needing to extend out 3m by using some of original house space, but that would require some significant structural works in taking out pretty much the whole 5.5m wide structural back wall (possible box frame/goalpost structure needed) - Option 2 below.
So looking for advice (if it’s a simple-ish answer) whether it’s likely to cost significantly more to do a bigger extension with less structural work, or to do the smaller extension but with more structural work? Or is it not that simple to answer and a case of needing to get the builders to quote for both designs?
In my (relatively inexperienced) mind, once we’re already extending at least 3m it feels like it would be more cost efficient & less complicated to just go out another +1.5m rather than having to go down the more “complex” structural route??
Simplistic drawings below to illustrate this particular scenario (mine, not the architects drawings, in case you weren’t sure )...
We have permission to go out 4.5m (on a 5.5m width) and this would be the preference (Option 1 below), but budget is a major factor and in theory for what we want to achieve (7.5m x 5.5m open plan space) we could get away with only needing to extend out 3m by using some of original house space, but that would require some significant structural works in taking out pretty much the whole 5.5m wide structural back wall (possible box frame/goalpost structure needed) - Option 2 below.
So looking for advice (if it’s a simple-ish answer) whether it’s likely to cost significantly more to do a bigger extension with less structural work, or to do the smaller extension but with more structural work? Or is it not that simple to answer and a case of needing to get the builders to quote for both designs?
In my (relatively inexperienced) mind, once we’re already extending at least 3m it feels like it would be more cost efficient & less complicated to just go out another +1.5m rather than having to go down the more “complex” structural route??
Simplistic drawings below to illustrate this particular scenario (mine, not the architects drawings, in case you weren’t sure )...