Was he aggressive at the time?Are you saying George was not an aggressive man?
Was he aggressive at the time?Are you saying George was not an aggressive man?
We have covered one extremely rare example which occurred due to serious police failings
”can” does not mean always.
The two cases can’t be compared: In the George Floyd case, he was lying face down and there were 3 police officers at the scene, I presume all armed.…so had Floyd tried to go for a gun whilst lying face down and handcuffs behind his back, the police had plenty of time to deal with it
Please can you tell me what danger the police wouldve been in had they stopped kneeling on his neck
Was he aggressive at the time?
And he had him restrained and under control with other armed officers around.Derek Chauvin worked with George on the doors. He knew George he knew he was a dangerous individual.
Yep. Kill them. Got no chance thenIt's not a Dirty Harry picture . It's real life where you don't take no chances.
Very, the one with a camera put one of the killers behind bars for 22.5 years.but the baying mob around the arrested criminal were still dangerous.
There was no justification in Minneapolis Police shooting dead Justine Damond an inocent women who lay asleep in the safety of her own home..And he had him restrained and under control with other armed officers around.
Please explain why you think it is OK for the police to kill people under these circumstances
So you approve of police killing people.There was no justification in Minneapolis Police shooting dead Justine Damond an inocent women who lay asleep in the safety of her own home..
There was no justification in the murder of Sarah Everard an innocent young lady murdered by an English cop.
Both of these women where decent human beings that did nothing wrong.
George on the over hand was anything but an innocent man. There was no doubt that these girls deaths was anything to do with fire arms, robbery or the cocktail of alcohol and drugs inside them.
You live by the sword you die by the sword.
So you approve of police killing people.
Who maintains that list and decides who can be killed?
I think you need to think things through a bit deeper. You are beginning to come across as groomed
So you approve of police deciding who to kill.As long as certain people are nasty ruthless criminals that carry guns!
I'd loose no sleep for them.
So you approve of police deciding who to kill.
But you don't think it was murder.
More than a little confused I think
So you don't agree that kneeling on his neck was the cause.Your confused as I've said and you know I said that I think it's was the cocktail of drugs that killed him.
The police didn't shovel thst shît in side of him
So it seems your confused as your not listening to me.
So you don't agree that kneeling on his neck was the cause.
Fair enough, anything to back that up with?
You've been groomed. You are now a full member of the dark side.
real life is not without chancesIt's not a Dirty Harry picture . It's real life where you don't take no chances.
That’s ok, he wasn’t charged with deliberately killing him.I've said before that I don't believe Chauvin was a nice man . I also don't believe this man deliberately killed George.