- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Maybe. I'm not willing to pay more if I don't know why.Problem is there never seems to be any details ....
Maybe. I'm not willing to pay more if I don't know why.Problem is there never seems to be any details ....
Maybe. I'm not willing to pay more if I don't know why.
Is it though, you said there wasn't much detail.Improved services, roads, healthcare?
I'm not paying 5p on income tax for an extra nurse in a hospital nowhere near me. The detail is required.
Is it though, you said there wasn't much detail.
I'm not paying 5p on income tax for an extra nurse in a hospital nowhere near me. The detail is required.
It was to make my point. There's no point saying "would you pay more for a better service", without ant detail. How much more, and how? What services would be improved and to what extent? How would we know? Are the improvements measurable? What if services don't improve as expected.Thats rather selfish to say the very least.
It was to make my point. There's no point saying "would you pay more for a better service", without ant detail. How much more, and how? What services would be improved and to what extent? How would we know? Are the improvements measurable? What if services don't improve as expected.
I'm not against paying more per say but politicians don't always deliver. Remember the side of the red bus...
Gordon Brown changing the tax rules for private pensions springs to mind .......
Actually, an extremely trivial effect on the growth of your fund
Compounded over 17 years. Every little helps
Hmm maybe, but....Thats rather selfish to say the very least.
1% on NI would bring in about £6 billion .......... and most people wouldn't notice extra payment either
I do think that NI should be paid, at a lower rate, by pensioners - obviously OVER a sensible income threshold and before anybody jumps in with any wise cracks - I'm due to be economically inactive this summer so this would cost me.