U values for wall insulation

R

rreanor

Joined
10 Dec 2018
Messages
116
Reaction score
1
Country
United Kingdom
I've been using various online calculators for calculating u values for wall insulation, however they seem to vary considerably and make massive assumptions.

I need to decide how thick insulated plasterboard i install into some bedrooms - my property is a victorian semi detached, 2x brick skin without a cavity. The ceilings are higher than usual - 2.7m and there are large (sometimes bay) windows of at least 1.5m square, there is enough insulation in the loft above.

Is 62mm celotex/kingspan sufficient? I will be fixing it via batons, as there is no render externally and i dont want to remove all the plaster as its in good nic.
 
Why would you be given a choice? Is the objective not just to retain as much heat as possible?
 
rreanor said:
Why would you be given a choice? Is the objective not just to retain as much heat as possible?
Click to expand...
If that was the case you would put 1000mm thick insulation on your walls, more a case of having having an adequate amount to be cost effective in saving heat/money

Generally minimum requirement is based on building regs but people can improve on this if they so wish.

Current BR U value for new builds I believe is 0.18 at the moment.

In your case your achieved U value is 0.3


Screenshot (1262).png
Screenshot (1263).png
 
Dereekoo said:
If that was the case you would put 1000mm thick insulation on your walls, more a case of having having an adequate amount to be cost effective in saving heat/money

Generally minimum requirement is based on building regs but people can improve on this if they so wish.

Current BR U value for new builds I believe is 0.18 at the moment.

In your case your achieved U value is 0.3


View attachment 320183View attachment 320184
Click to expand...
Thanks, do you mean the u value i've achieved without any wall insulation, or that would be the achieved value if i were to put 62mm PIR board on?

If the latter, would 0.3 be considered decent?

One thing i would say is that most new builds are unbearably hot during the summer, does this indicate that the target u value for new builds is basically too high?
 
I suspect what you want to know, and something that interests me, is at what point do you start chasing marginal returns. As above, you could fit a metre of celotex and heat your home with a candle but a line has to be drawn somewhere. My extension is to the now old regs bug I'm wondering whether to insulate internally to beef it up - selfishly I probably won't as I don't want to lose the space and I doubt I'll see much payback in the 5-10 years we'll stay in the house.
 
cdbe said:
I suspect what you want to know, and something that interests me, is at what point do you start chasing marginal returns. As above, you could fit a metre of celotex and heat your home with a candle but a line has to be drawn somewhere. My extension is to the now old regs bug I'm wondering whether to insulate internally to beef it up - selfishly I probably won't as I don't want to lose the space and I doubt I'll see much payback in the 5-10 years we'll stay in the house.
Click to expand...
Yes sort of, but i'm happy to put in 62mm insulation, but any thicker than that and it starts to become an issue. I guess what i want to know is will 62mm insulation make a big difference, or marginal? The 'real feel' of my house is that as soon as the heating goes off, you notice it starting to cool down immediately, whereas i compare it to more modern properties (even my parents 80s house which has insulated cavity) and it retains the heat for a lot longer.
 
rreanor said:
Thanks, do you mean the u value i've achieved without any wall insulation, or that would be the achieved value if i were to put 62mm PIR board on?

If the latter, would 0.3 be considered decent?

One thing i would say is that most new builds are unbearably hot during the summer, does this indicate that the target u value for new builds is basically too high?
Click to expand...
0.3 achieved with insulation. Without it your U value is 2.12 so you would make the wall about 7 times more effective in retaining the heat

Screenshot (1264).png

Building regs state that if a thermal element (e.g. a wall) is upgraded it should not have a U value of greater than 0.7 and suggests an improved value of at least 0.3 so your proposal can be considered to be within normal parameters.


Screenshot (1265).png
 
Dereekoo said:
0.3 achieved with insulation. Without it your U value is 2.12 so you would make the wall about 7 times more effective in retaining the heat

View attachment 320196
Building regs state that if a thermal element (e.g. a wall) is upgraded it should not have a U value of greater than 0.7 and suggests an improved value of at least 0.3 so your proposal can be considered to be within normal parameters.


View attachment 320200
Click to expand...
tHANK YOU VERY MUCH
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top