Attached are several pictures of two Velux windows installed in June and then yesterday changed to follow the recommendation of Building Control for a Regularisation Application. I know nothing and am posting to see if anyone has any opinion about the structure in the picture. In particular (and perhaps I'm being naive) I cannot understand how the two new pieces of wood on the right side of the right window are being supported given that they do not run the length of the original rafters (ie from ridge to wall plate). Building Control had indicated the following:
"It is considered that the rafters should be doubled and bolted together on all four sides of each roof-light. Rafters either side should span between the reach of the roof and the support. Needs to stand between the supports where the existing are (normally the ridge board down to the support, which is normally the wall plate). Some sort of nominal bolting so it acts as one piece rather. The ones that are in at the moment are OK. Just below the window there’s a stud wall, if it’s breaking the support then the rafter can finish there. Just need additional rafters either side from the ridge to the support wall. Can leave what’s there but double up on them."
Would love any opinions.
"It is considered that the rafters should be doubled and bolted together on all four sides of each roof-light. Rafters either side should span between the reach of the roof and the support. Needs to stand between the supports where the existing are (normally the ridge board down to the support, which is normally the wall plate). Some sort of nominal bolting so it acts as one piece rather. The ones that are in at the moment are OK. Just below the window there’s a stud wall, if it’s breaking the support then the rafter can finish there. Just need additional rafters either side from the ridge to the support wall. Can leave what’s there but double up on them."
Would love any opinions.