Angela Rayner

JohnD said:
And yet you pretend to have seen all the evidence so that you can pronounce her guilty of tax evasion.
Click to expand...
the evidence is public, the clear evidence of capital gain is public, the lack of understanding of the rules is public, the attempt to cover up the mistake is public, the lying about where she was actually living is public.

What isn't public is if she and her ex-husband quietly contacted HMRC to correct the filing or if HMRC have invited her to do so.

It's quite common for HMRC to invite you to review your filing when they are aware of a possible error. None of this hits the press.
 
motorbiking said:
the evidence is public, the clear evidence of capital gain is public, the lack of understanding of the rules is public, the attempt to cover up the mistake is public, the lying about where she was actually living is public.

What isn't public is if she and her ex-husband quietly contacted HMRC to correct the filing or if HMRC have invited her to do so.

It's quite common for HMRC to invite you to review your filing when they are aware of a possible error. None of this hits the press.
Click to expand...
If thats the case Id be surprised if it stayed confidential for long
 
motorbiking said:
the evidence is public, the clear evidence of capital gain is public, the lack of understanding of the rules is public, the attempt to cover up the mistake is public, the lying about where she was actually living is public.
Click to expand...
Then the authorities will throw the book at her, don't panic...

Unless, of course, there's no reason to...
 
Motorbiking really, really can't stop himself obsessing about Angela.

She frightens the Tories so much.
 
motorbiking said:
Anyone can see that she and/or he did not follow the rules. One of them tried to lie about it and likely caused a problem for the other in doing so.
Click to expand...
Actually no, no one can see anything of the sort.

Capital gains is a very tricky area, back in 2016 the rule book ran to some 460 pages. You did not have to live at a property to declare it your main residence.... living somewhere and your main residence are actually two separate issues under tax law.
 
JonathanM said:
Do you still think the "cover up" is going to bring her down?
Click to expand...
As I said at the start, she made a mistake and misunderstood tax rules that for her were probably a new experience. Her bigger mistake was to try to cover it up by lying.

When Labour win the election, she will have to stop being the angry gobsh*te and start being accountable. You can see her weakness and Keir will need to manage her swiftly as he did all the other problems.
 
martygturner said:
Actually no, no one can see anything of the sort.

Capital gains is a very tricky area, back in 2016 the rule book ran to some 460 pages. You did not have to live at a property to declare it your main residence.... living somewhere and your main residence are actually two separate issues under tax law.
Click to expand...
except she made no such filing.
 
I wonder if her ex neighbours told porkies? She's done very well for herself regardless of anybodies personal views. Maybe she was living with hubby and they wanted to stick the knife in. Who knows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top