Angela Rayner

motorbiking said:
The fact remains - married couples can only claim one residence as home, irrelevant of where they claim they lived.
Click to expand...

That's interesting.

Does that apply to married Conservative politicians?
 
It's great to see motorbiking raising public interest in sleaze stories.

"Tory MP Suella Braverman claims £25,000 to pay household bills after 'milking loophole'
The Home Secretary claimed almost £25,000 in expenses , while living rent-free at her parent's house during visits to her constituency."
 
motorbiking said:
I guess its Squirrel time.
Click to expand...

Yes, with the Tory government plummeting to its doom, MPs and ministers announcing their resignations, public services in collapse, and Rishi under attack from his own side, motorbiking seeks a distraction.

What a surprise, he's found a woman, who is not a Tory.
 
mitch66 said:
FAIK a married couple can only have one primary home. She was on the electoral role at his address. Simples surely?
Click to expand...
This seems to be what you missed or omitted.
As s. 222(6) indicates that a married couple or civil partners can have only one residence or main residence 'so long as living together', it follows that this ceases to apply when they no longer live together.
Click to expand...

JonathanM said:
What are the police actually investigating? Is it just where she was registered to vote?
Click to expand...
There is no obligation to register at your home address if you live in more than one address.
Students, second home owners etc, can choose where to register.
 
Last edited:
Mottie said:
Classic!
Like me, I assume he is a UK tax payer unlike you so it is our business to ponder such questions.
Click to expand...
It is no business of yours, nor motorbiking's, nor anyone else what kind of marriage she has.
motorbiking said:
What kind of marriage was this?
Click to expand...
space junkie said:
What business is it of yours?
Click to expand...

Mottie said:
What business is it of yours asking such questions of another forum member?
Click to expand...
You can consider my question as a rhetoric comment.
I neither expected an answer, nor particularly wanted one.

But if motorbiking has the right to ask questions of AR's marriage (and you appear to think he does have that right), you're being hypocritical to deny me the same right to ask such questions as: "What business is it of yours?"
 
motorbiking said:
This wont go anywhere..

It's not a crime to be a hypocrite.
Click to expand...
Neither is it a crime to be registered at another place where you reside from time to time, however temporarily.
So there's not the slightest misdemeanour committed, so it won't go anywhere.

motorbiking said:
But I enjoyed seeing the mounting rage in her face when Susanna Reid gave her a very light grilling.
Click to expand...
You enjoyed the distress caused to a female MP?
Weird!
motorbiking said:
No doubt the forum f*tards will claim its because I hate women.
Click to expand...
Your earlier statement appears to confirm any suspicions about that.
You appear to enjoy watching a female MP in distress with lurid attempts to make her marriage arrangements, and those of her family, public.
 
Why don't politicians who are accused of this kind of thing make a public statement they will talk to "whoever there is a debt with" and pledge to settle it?

If there isn't a debt, then there's no problem, if there is, it is settled.

Sorted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top