Boned

gant said:
We will see in the New Year.
Click to expand...

After a hearing and an appeal?

Has he thought of something new to say?

Or does he imagine there are a lot of voters who want a perve in Parliament?
 
I can't understand your haste.
My interest lies in why it's surfaced after all this time, that's more the story.
 
gant said:
And it's come to light after how long why now?
Why would it be considered weird in this f*cked up world.?
Click to expand...
The internal party investigation was delayed five years due to an administrative error, the file was lost. The complainant withdrew his complaint because of tory incompetence, nothing on that from ree-smugg though because they are not civil servants.
 
blup said:
The internal party investigation was delayed five years due to an administrative error, the file was lost. The complainant withdrew his complaint because of tory incompetence, nothing on that from ree-smugg though because they are not civil servants.
Click to expand...
Could be then that when he was a prominent member of the brexiteer side of the tories he was afforded some protection and now the remainder side has gained the upper hand he's been thrown under a bus.
 
gant said:
Could be then that when he was a prominent member of the brexiteer side of the tories he was afforded some protection and now the remainder side has gained the upper hand he's been thrown under a bus.
Click to expand...
So he should have been metaphorically thrown under the bus a long time ago.
And the Tory party would have suffered for it.
So, in whose benefit was the original complaint 'lost'?
 
gant said:
and now the remainder side has gained the upper hand he's been thrown under a bus.
Click to expand...
The panel who found him guilty weren't MP's? Do you know the political leanings of the panel or how/if they voted on Brexit?
 
denso13 said:
The panel who found him guilty weren't MP's? Do you know the political leanings of the panel or how/if they voted on Brexit?
Click to expand...
What does that matter the evidence was 'lost' at the time brexiteer were at their most prominent when Boris got an 80 seat majority.
 
Roy Bloom said:
So he should have been metaphorically thrown under the bus a long time ago.
And the Tory party would have suffered for it.
So, in whose benefit was the original complaint 'lost'?
Click to expand...
Can't see him making such a significant difference as he remained a back bencher.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top