You do know you could get pigeon holed on here for getting your news from the BBC, steady.
Covid Inquiry
- Thread starter Roy Bloom
- Start date
You keep yer pigeon's where i can see 'em, Speckled Jim.
It's the daily mail so it's all fictitious but it gives an idea of some of the comment directed at the inquisitor.
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Panto probe unfairly casts Boris as villain
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: The Covid Inquiry is meant to be a measured investigation of the facts around Britain's handling of the pandemic.
Think this will get discussed?
www.texasattorneygeneral.gov
Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Pfizer for Misrepresenting COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy and Conspiring to Censor Public Discourse
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product.
www.texasattorneygeneral.gov
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
In the UK covid enquiry? Is that a real question?
It is if you think the efficacy of the vaccine should be recorded at the enquiry.
You think it shouldn't?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
It's a court case brought by a whacko republican, it shouldn't be discussed.
:focal(0x291:3600x2400)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/b0cccddfe89887f8d061a6fc4633e476/SCOTUS%20Paxton%20Presser%20TT%20EL%2003.jpg)
As attorney general, Paxton’s ideological crusades have drowned out his day job
Child support enforcement, environmental regulation, consumer protection and a host of other responsibilities fall under the attorney general’s realm at what is essentially the state’s largest law firm.
www.texastribune.org
Vaccines and therapeutics will be investigated in module 4 of the inquiry.
Vaccines and therapeutics (Module 4) - UK Covid-19 Inquiry
The independent public inquiry to examine the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK
covid19.public-inquiry.uk
So your alright with it being discussed.
If you knew it was being discussed why didn't you point that out instead of trying to paint me in a bad light by asking if it's a real question.? Because it's something you do, something you can't help yourself doing.?
If you knew it was being discussed why didn't you point that out instead of trying to paint me in a bad light by asking if it's a real question.? Because it's something you do, something you can't help yourself doing.?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
A whacko republican suing Pfizer shouldn't be discussed. That would be stupid, but that's the link you posted.
Blame yourself for sloppy posting, again.
Never judge a book by its cover, best wait the outcome of the court case I'd have thought, or are you so certain of your belief in the Pfizer vaccine you dismiss anything negative to do with the Pfizer vaccine out of hand.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Why should a US court case be discussed in the UK covid enquiry?
You think it can't be brought up when discussing the efficacy of a vaccine, that supposedly wants to find out 'facts'
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
It can, but I think it shouldn't. This republican sues people for a living, he has taken the Biden administration to court over 50 times.
Probably more of a surprise if he didn't sue Pfizer.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
It's an allegation, not a "fact". I don't think the UK inquiry should be investigating those of trigger happy republicans. Just look up some of the stupid cases he has lost.
Where did I say it was fact, the court case will uncover how much is conjecture and if the outcome is revealed before the UK inquiry into vaccines could be a valuable contribution.