Domestic Electrical Installation Condition Report

... my electrician told me that, he can't get involved too much as the governing body is refusing to help (he spoke to his inspector about that matter) as it would mean that they going to have a case against themselves for allowing this kind of people to be certified by them.
That pretty well sums up what many people have been saying - these competent persons schemes are really not that much more than a scam and the perpetrators are more interested in their membership fees than in their responsibility to the public good.
One of the conditions of the mortgage being that the rent had to be at least double the mortgage payment.
IME that's unusual. Different lenders use different criteria - sometimes without actually telling you what they are :confused:
Mostly I've come across 125% (i.e. the rent must be at least 125% of the mortgage payments), sometimes 145% - but it can vary depending on your other income and the size of the mortgage (LTV).
On one occasion, I went to enquire with a lender, having looked at their offerings online and working out that it could be what I need. So went along to the local branch, gave the details they asked for, and was given a completely different (much lower) maximum loan value. After some discussion, the other person was able to find out (she had to phone someone else) that they used a different figure to what was on their site :rolleyes: I commented that this has caused a complete and utter waste of time for both of us, but all they could say was "not enough room on the site for everything" :mad:
 
IME that's unusual. Different lenders use different criteria - sometimes without actually telling you what they are :confused:
Mostly I've come across 125% (i.e. the rent must be at least 125% of the mortgage payments), sometimes 145% - but it can vary depending on your other income and the size of the mortgage (LTV).
On one occasion, I went to enquire with a lender, having looked at their offerings online and working out that it could be what I need. So went along to the local branch, gave the details they asked for, and was given a completely different (much lower) maximum loan value. After some discussion, the other person was able to find out (she had to phone someone else) that they used a different figure to what was on their site :rolleyes: I commented that this has caused a complete and utter waste of time for both of us, but all they could say was "not enough room on the site for everything" :mad:
My 3 mortgages were taken out between 1999 & 2001, one of those application forms calculations worked on 225% but the assistant said they were happy with 200% which was just about where the figures were. In those days 125% would not have broken even by the time all the other costs were taken into account, such as 10-15%+VAT for agents fees, insurance, gas and electric tests.
I looked at another property about 5-7 years ago but at the time the figures simply didn't add up, the difference between the repayments on an 80% loan and the potential rent was very small which most certainly didn't leave enough for other costs. With the recent significant house price rises I guess it's got worse. I only have knowledge for this area, others may be very different.
 
Back
Top