Expanded ULEZ

I've already said, nothing to fetch.

Go fetch your non-existent post, post it up here, and I'll apologise.

I'll not be holding my breath though.

Liar.
 
I've already said, nothing to fetch.

Go fetch your non-existent post, post it up here, and I'll apologise.

I'll not be holding my breath though.

Liar.
You made the accusation, it's up to you to prosecute the case, providing all the evidence.



Off you go. good dog.
 
I mean I can't see how the absence of a set of traffic lights is the primary cause of a collision.
It shouldn't be. I was taught as a 17 yo that if the lights are out, to treat the junction as if the lights never existed and give way. It's no biggie.
 
It shouldn't be. I was taught as a 17 yo that if the lights are out, to treat the junction as if the lights never existed and give way. It's no biggie.
Five sets of lights. That doesn't sound like a trivial one. The police had to station officers there to manage traffic.
 
Five sets of lights. That doesn't sound like a trivial one. The police had to station officers there to manage traffic.
I've seen accidents in 1 way lanes in car parks, let alone junctions controlled because of the volume of traffic and possible directions available.
 
Back
Top