Ok, to skirt the interference issue, which I'm not concerned about, perhaps pretend that I am linking two routers on separate phases with an FTP Ethernet cable. Can anyone see an issue with this?The reason is that to do so will cause interference and being reasonable people we don't want you to do that. I don't know if it will work either.
Ok, to skirt the interference issue, which I'm not concerned about,
pretend that I am linking two routers on separate phases with an FTP Ethernet cable.
WELL YOU SHOULD BE.
Ok, to skirt the interference issue, which I'm not concerned about because I don't care about my neighbours ability to watch TV, listen to the radio or use their own non-interfering devices, let alone the emergency services ability to communicate even though one day it may be to request more assistance at my property, perhaps pretend that I am linking two routers on separate phases with an FTP Ethernet cable. Can anyone see an issue with this?
Surely for the adaptors to communicate with each other, they have to be on the same conductor
There I fixed your message for you. You're welcome.
I'm not.Seeing as you are so against these, which I agree with, why on earth are you promoting that web site?
They are if they cause problems.Regarding interference, thanks for all the concern, but there are no neighbours here, the TP Link devices are not illegal (afaik)
And I think you need to go out and buy a lot of social responsibility.And phatboy, I think you need to have a sit down. If you're that worried about radio interference, you're going to have to go out and buy a lot of tin foil!
So far nobody has said 'OMG, you can't bridge two phases with a data link' so perhaps it's not something I should be concerned about.??