If you can't play nicely then **** off.
Free speech and expensive lies
- Thread starter IT Minion
- Start date
D
Deleted member 294929
That's not very nice.
Trump et al = losers.
Wouldn't January 6th have been poetic...
I see I was wasting my time, and you've not advanced your understanding the slightest little bit.
D
Deleted member 294929
So if I said somthing like Africuns we all know what it would mean. Are you saying it would not be taken offensively by some?
You're totally missing the point.
You accused soemone of being racist for mispelling 'Americans'.
I was taking the micky when I said your accusation of racism was misplaced becauuse American is not a race, it's a nationality.
I was hoping you would correct my false argument.
Obviously you didn't understand the invalidity of my comment, nor understand your own misuse of the accusation of racism.
Then you compounded your misunderstanding of racism by accusing me of being racist.
I've decided you're a lost cause.
However I will attempt to explain the use of 'Americuns', even though I'm probably wasting my time.
'Americuns' is merely a way of indicating how many Americans pronounce 'American'. It's not racist, it's an attempt to mimic the pronunciation.
Another misprunciation could be as extreme as Umerucu, or Umerucuns.
No-one ever says Africu or Africuns, nor Ufricu or Ufricuns.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 294929
He didn't miss spell. You can jingle your coins in your pocket and make excuses.
I don't care if the right word is racism or not it's amounts to the same bigoted hatred you seem to share.
Making a play on the word 'American' isn't necessarily racist, no matter how hard you try to shoehorn an argument into the comment.
Donald J. Trump on the other hand is much more unambiguous...
Donald Trump is facing a backlash for repeating a remark at a political rally on Saturday where he said undocumented immigrants to the United States are “poisoning the blood of our country”.
The former US president’s comments were the latest example of his campaign rhetoric that seemed to go beyond the lies and exaggerations that are a trademark of his stump speeches and instead go into territory of outright extremism or racism. In November he was widely condemned for calling his opponents “vermin”, language that echoed that used historically by dictators and authoritarians.
[Joe] Biden noted that despite progress, “hate never goes away. It only hides”, adding pointedly: “Today, there are those who still demonize immigrants and fan the flames of intolerance. It’s wrong.”
The Guardian.com
Donald J. Trump on the other hand is much more unambiguous...
Donald Trump is facing a backlash for repeating a remark at a political rally on Saturday where he said undocumented immigrants to the United States are “poisoning the blood of our country”.
The former US president’s comments were the latest example of his campaign rhetoric that seemed to go beyond the lies and exaggerations that are a trademark of his stump speeches and instead go into territory of outright extremism or racism. In November he was widely condemned for calling his opponents “vermin”, language that echoed that used historically by dictators and authoritarians.
[Joe] Biden noted that despite progress, “hate never goes away. It only hides”, adding pointedly: “Today, there are those who still demonize immigrants and fan the flames of intolerance. It’s wrong.”
The Guardian.com
Misspelling can be accidental or intentional.
If I write bud instead of bad, it can be intentional or accidental.
If it's intentional, it's the intent behind it that matters.
The writer was well aware that it wasn't racist to misspell Americans.
They're not excuses. They were never intended to be excuses. There is no reason to excuse a perfectly inocent remark.
It was an attempt to further your understanding of the concept of racism.
Evidently you refuse to consider your understanding of racism to be woefully inadequate., and refuse to learn.
You ought to care, because not caring if you intentionally and falsely make such serious allegations can land you with big problems, not to mention your total lack of understanding of the concept, which you appear to be eager to demonstrate.
Only you construe it as racism. That's because you do not understand the concept of racism.
But instead of learning about the concept of racism and how it can be detected, opposed or presented, you prefer to make further false, vexatious, frivolous accusations about a concept, which you have clearly demonstrated, you do not understand.
D
Deleted member 294929
Misspelling can be accidental or intentional.
If I write bud instead of bad, it can be intentional or accidental.
If it's intentional, it's the intent behind it that matters.
The writer was well aware that it wasn't racist to misspell Americans.
They're not excuses. They were never intended to be excuses. There is no reason to excuse a perfectly inocent remark.
It was an attempt to further your understanding of the concept of racism.
Evidently you refuse to consider your understanding of racism to be woefully inadequate., and refuse to learn.
You ought to care, because not caring if you intentionally and falsely make such serious allegations can land you with big problems, not to mention your total lack of understanding of the concept, which you appear to be eager to demonstrate.
Only you construe it as racism. That's because you do not understand the concept of racism.
But instead of learning about the concept of racism and how it can be detected, opposed or presented, you prefer to make further false, vexatious, frivolous accusations about a concept, which you have clearly demonstrated, you do not understand.
I think I understand Racism. I think your saying Americans are not a race. Is that because Americans are a mix?
So Pakistan being a mix that's consists of displaced Indians and migrants from Bengal and Afghanistan amongst others., means the P word can't be racist.
Last edited by a moderator:
Ye Gods!!!
I would go to the effort of explaining my original post:
But I realise it would be a total waste of time, you'd still fail to understand, a) the original irony in my post, and b) what I was trying to convey about your lack of understanding of racism.
As it stands you've done the second part for me.
D
Deleted member 294929
Ye Gods!!!
I would go to the effort of explaining my original post:
But I realise it would be a total waste of time, you'd still fail to understand, a) the original irony in my post, and b) what I was trying to convey about your lack of understanding of racism.
As it stands you've done the second part for me.
So your saying abuse of one group of people is acceptable where's abuse of another group of people is not acceptable.
Is this excusing your hatred toward Jews and Israelis
Is Pakistan not a nationality?
D