Freesat replacing Sky

[foxhole]

@Harry Bloomfield , maybe I'm not reading this in the same way you are, but I don't see where @foxhole said that £23/month was just for TV streaming.

If someone says to me "web access", I kind of take it as read that they mean their internet service. What it's used for - be it email, surfing, streaming or whatever - that's incidental.

That’s exactly as I stated Lucid , thought it was clear .

 

[Lucid]

Yes, it was clear to me. Not sure how HB got hold of the other end of the stick.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Yes, it was clear to me. Not sure how HB got hold of the other end of the stick.

The way it was explained by foxhole, it suggested to me he had replaced a Sky subscription, by a £23 Internet subscription for the sole purpose of streaming TV. For most people, web access was taken up for email and browsing, long before streaming came along.

 

[foxhole]

The way it was explained by foxhole, it suggested to me he had replaced a Sky subscription, by a £23 Internet subscription for the sole purpose of streaming TV. For most people, web access was taken up for email and browsing, long before streaming came along.

Have another pint Harry

 

[Lucid]

The way it was explained by foxhole, it suggested to me he had replaced a Sky subscription, by a £23 Internet subscription for the sole purpose of streaming TV. For most people, web access was taken up for email and browsing, long before streaming came along.

We both read the same post. Not trying to make a big deal out f it, but I didn't take it that there was any kind of swap, and nor did I take it that the "web browsing" was somehow just for TV surfing.