German Police

We have a pretty good balance here regarding protests. Somewhere between China and France. I wonder whether these right wing snowflakes objected to the fuel protests in the early 2000s?
 
JonathanM said:
We have a pretty good balance here regarding protests. Somewhere between China and France. I wonder whether these right wing snowflakes objected to the fuel protests in the early 2000s?
Click to expand...

If you disagree with someone just insult them eh?

How grown up...
 
JonathanM said:
I wonder whether these right wing snowflakes objected to the fuel protests in the early 2000s?
Click to expand...
The gammons were practically wetting themselves, whilst vandals were destroying ULEZ cameras and the like. MBK could not contain his glee. Even kept a running commentary.
 
gas112 said:
what bit are you struggling with that despite governments /scientists etc back then were claiming global warming actual climatologists said it was based highly uncertain scientific theories .
Click to expand...
The bit you're struggling with is that the information has changed in the last 26 years. It's not difficult to understand if you try very hard.
 
diy_fun_uk said:
Where did I say I don't support protests?
Click to expand...
It's a "where do you draw the line" thing imho.

Thousands marchin and hollerin through specific London streets on a Sunday having informed/agreed with the public services is one thing, gueing yourself to a motorway is another.
 
Justin Passing said:
It's a "where do you draw the line" thing imho.

Thousands marchin and hollerin through specific London streets on a Sunday having informed/agreed with the public services is one thing, gueing yourself to a motorway is another.
Click to expand...
And it's those ones who should be tolerated maybe for 30-60 mins and then water cannoned, tear gassed and if need be tasered.
 
Justin Passing said:
The bit you're struggling with is that the information has changed in the last 26 years. It's not difficult to understand if you try very hard.
Click to expand...
Not difficult to understand that you are a Walter mitty . Carry on getting your pants pulled down .
 
gas112 said:
Not difficult to understand that you are a Walter mitty . Carry on getting your pants pulled down .
Click to expand...

So which bit of the basics do you agree/disagree with.

Do you agree that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased by more than a third over the past 65 years.
Do you agree that carbon dioxide absorbs long wave infra red radiation and this causes it to heat up.
Do you agree that the earth radiates long wave infra red radiation.
 
JonathanM said:
So which bit of the basics do you agree/disagree with.

Do you agree that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased by more than a third over the past 65 years.
Do you agree that carbon dioxide absorbs long wave infra red radiation and this causes it to heat up.
Do you agree that the earth radiates long wave infra red radiation.
Click to expand...
Do I think your getting getting shafted about effecting 0.04 % of the atmosphere by less than ten percent . Yeah . Can you tell me why before any mankind let alone industry were on this planet CO2 levels were far higher
 
gas112 said:
Can you tell me why before any mankind let alone industry were on this planet CO2 levels were far higher
Click to expand...

Constant and extreme volcanoes erupting, I believe. Temperatures were at least 15C higher than now in the time of the dinosaurs. Life for humans would have been impossible. I accept that may not matter to some people. We have to go back about ten million years to find a carbon dioxide level as high as we have now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top