Eddie M said:
1) I lived near London and there was a distinct possibility that I would have to commute from the parental home to university, very uncool.
Nah, I lived 30 minutes' drive away but still got halls, twas grand.
2) As I said the facilities were very tatty and ancient, although I accept that this has probably changed now.
Tis now very good, I must say my experience of Bristol halls was not too good, obviously Uni's renovate on a long timecycle so when Bristol is good, Imperial is bad and vice versa!
3) Female to Male ratio was shockingly bad at Imperial.
I saw a girl there once, and she wasn't a lecturer!
I think they are up to a ratio of just 3 men to 1 woman, but some courses actually have more women than men! I brought my own. One of the things that attracted me to Bristol was the accent of the towny women, nice.
4) It was cold and raining when I went to Imperial and was sunny and warm when I went to Bristol..... no, it's important.
But in London it is always at least 1 degree warmer than the surroundings due to our smog.
Seriously, once I was riding down the A316 on that flyover near Hammersmith, a summer's day, 32 degrees, and the sky was yellow
5) The sports facilities weren't anything like as good, although I accept that this has probably changed now.
You can't have looked into this much! There is a great boathouse for rowing, a brilliant rugby pitch for rugby and football, a big swimming pool, a decent gym, tennis courts, Hyde Park for running and cycling. And they have "alternative" sports such as mountain climbing and juggling too. Only the pool and gym are "new", the rest has been there for many decades, albeit some of it is a few miles from the main campus.
6) I don't like London that much.
PHILISTINE!!!! What's not to like? The only problem I had with it was there was too much to do! Rent stings a bit though: £100 a week when my mate in Sheffield was paying £20
7) Did I mention that I don't like London?
GAAAAAAGH!!!! PHILISTINE^2!!!!