- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
I didn't. You're making false allegations.It’s not about if he was wrong or right, it’s about saying someone is dishonest or lying. You had no grounds to call him a liar.
Paranoia for you.Wasn’t aimed at you. I posted before refreshing the thread.
It's normal for motorbiking to be a little vague with his responses.Paranoia for you.
Your saying your a bit thick, it was obvious who it was directed at.It's normal for motorbiking to be a little vague with his responses.
It's at least the second time he's accused someone of being disingenuine without specifying who.
It's his idea of discussion. You'll get used to it.You do like to twist people's comments into something they're absolutely not. You did it to me, when I questioned if something had really happened, and you twisted it into, "So you think they deserved it"!
Your tactic of debate is dishonest and immature.
I suspect that is because you have difficulty with the fallibility of your arguments.
It's his idea of discussion. You'll get used to it.
It's quite common on this forum for some to misinterpret what was said, hence the frequent poor quality of genuine debate.Your saying your a bit thick,
That'll be why motorbiking felt the need, belatedly, to address it to someone specific.it was obvious who it was directed at.
Was it you who was rolling round laughing at saying you can't eat the manor.It's quite common on this forum for some to misinterpret what was said, hence the frequent poor quality of genuine debate.
It was also me who posted this:Was it you who was rolling round laughing at saying you can't eat the manor.
Ambiguity:
Flying planes can be dangerous.
The fish is ready to eat.
Grammar: Eats shoots and leaves.
Spelling:
rouge
Don't be hard on gant.Oh dear. I seem to have triggered the neurodivergence again.