It's OK to kill journalists

Its not a problem for me - I wasn't daft enough to go there.

According to the Houthi's Egypt is part of occupied Palestine.

they attacked MMSI 229988000 which is was heading to Egypt "Occupied Palestine" apparently.
 
Last edited:
motorbiking said:
Its not a problem for me - I wasn't daft enough to go there.
Click to expand...


I see you are untroubled by slaughter of journalists, as well as of civilians and children.

Funny thing, I thought I'd seen you complaining about such things.

Perhaps your opinions fluctuate.
 
motorbiking said:
You suggest it was a problem for me personally.
Click to expand...

What does that mean?

You've said that slaughter isn't a problem for you.

Are you suggesting it is only a problem for the man, woman or child who is killed?

That must be why you never complain about it.

Oops

Sometimes you do.
 
which of course was an answer to different question.

You understand that answers are given to specific questions.

I know it's a strange concept for you. (evidently)

Do you eat meat? if you do, I suggest slaughter isn't a problem for you. You understand the question is key?
 
Let me see now.

You find the slaughter of journalists excusable (if it's by Israel)

Do you deny that?
 
motorbiking said:
The fact is reporters like to go where the action is. They like to gear up in Army Fatigues, bullet proof vests etc or ride shot gun with the troops. Its probably this more than any other reason that places them in harms way
Click to expand...
 
Odds said:
And nothing to do with the way Israeli troops target them. Obviously.

international-journalist-safety-vest-helmet-peter-greste-reuters.jpg
Click to expand...


Do they report in beach shorts and flip flops then, when the Israelis are not involved?
 
Too tricky for motorbiking.


JohnD said:
Funny, I never heard you say that killing civilians and taking captives is wrong.

I never heard you say that preaching ethnic and racial hatred is wrong.

There must be a reason....

Do you believe that atrocities are justified in response to earlier atrocities?
Click to expand...
 
Soldiers don't get to choose when and where they fight and die
Civilians don't get to choose when war or terrorism comes to their home
Children shouldn't be kidnapped, beheaded, burned alive with petrol or bombed or shot.

[there is a long list of other things which I suspect would be obvious to those non-members of the hard of thinking club]
Nobody forces any press people in to a war zone

its regrettable that anyone dies before their time.

Just as its regrettable that the wrong people get in to politics or that poor people have to pay council tax to fund generous pensions that they can't save for or people who virtue signal about others taxes, while reducing their own, or complain of racism unless it's against people they hate.


You see @JohnD I will be here all day telling you
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top