It's OK to kill journalists

[Odds]

.
because its disputed and I don't believe there are no pro Hamas journalists, embedded in the organisation. The fact is (as shown here) almost everyone has an opinion on who is be being more barbaric than the other. It stands to reason that both are pushing propaganda through the media of their choosing.

Al Jazeera bureau chief's son Hamza al-Dahdouh among journalists killed in Gaza

Hamza al-Dahdouh was with colleagues when their car was reportedly hit in an Israeli air strike .

www.bbc.co.uk

An Israeli attack targeted the car he was travelling in with two other journalists.

Journalist Mustafa Thuraya was also killed in the attack, when the vehicle they were travelling in near al-Mawasi, a supposedly safe area towards the southwest, was struck by the missile. A third passenger, Hazem Rajab, was seriously injured.

The Al Jazeera Media Network strongly condemned the attack, adding: “The assassination of Mustafa and Hamza … whilst they were on their way to carry out their duty in the Gaza Strip, reaffirms the need to take immediate necessary legal measures against the occupation forces to ensure that there is no impunity.”

The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate has documented the killing of 102 journalists and the injury of 71 others by Israeli forces since hostilities began in October.


Allahu Akhbar@Al Jazeera

 

[Deleted member 294929]

Silly mottie. You're not in Israel now. You can't kill or arrest people who say things you don't like, or declare them to be terrorists and size their computers.

Silly Johnny You're not in Gaza now. You can't kill or throw people off buildings
who say things you don't like, or declare them un-islamic and size their families

 

[JohnD]

Silly Johnny You're not in Gaza now. You can't kill or throw people off buildings
who say things you don't like, or declare them un-islamic and size their families

Don't worry, dear, I have never had the slightest interest in declaring anyone "unislamic."



Glad I could set your mind at rest.

 

[Deleted member 294929]

Don't worry, dear, I have never had the slightest interest in declaring anyone "unislamic."



Glad I could set your mind at rest.

Just read that back to myself. It sounds so silly now I'm awake.

 

[JohnD]

.
because its disputed and I don't believe there are no pro Hamas journalists, embedded in the organisation.

I'm interested in your suggestion that it's OK to murder journalists if you don't share their political opinions, or if there are some other journalists nearby that you don't agree with.

You'd have no objection to killing a Guardian reporter, or a Zionist-leaning one then.

 

[motorbiking]

I'm interested in your suggestion that it's OK to murder journalists if you don't share their political opinions, or if there are some other journalists nearby that you don't agree with.

You'd have no objection to anybody killing a Guardian reporter, or a Zionist-leaning one, then.

These were your suggestions if you recall, not mine.

here you go - happy to help...

Is there anything YOU say that cannot be disputed?

You favour just killing them all because some of them might be pro-Palestine?

Of the examples I listed earlier, which are the ones proven to be terrorists?

Mark Regev claims that everybody is a terrorist. Is anything he says true?

"It took just one mention of the more than 11,000 Palestinians killed in Israel’s war on Gaza - a number that has since risen to 14,000 - for senior Netanyahu adviser Mark Regev to revert to the line that these are "Hamas numbers".

In a recent interview with Mehdi Hasan on MSNBC, Regev refused to acknowledge that Israel had killed children in its relentless and indiscriminate bombardment of the besieged Gaza Strip, suggesting that the hours of heart-wrenching footage aired daily could not be independently verified."

 

[Roy Bloom]

but killing 1200 innocent people - shhh motorbiking.. they were mostly jews..

The conflict did not begin on 7 October. It's been going on for decades.
It's Palestinians in their thousands that have borne the brunt of Israeli killing.
Nearly 400 of those killed on 7 October were military. Israel doesn't mention that. Israel also doesn't mention that they've been issuing arms, for free, to Israeli citizens. An armed civilian is a legitimate target.

Of the more than 22,000 Palestinians killed, just in the last three months, more than two thirds have been women and children.

 

[JohnD]

This is what you said.

.
because its disputed and I don't believe there are no pro Hamas journalists, embedded in the organisation.

You didn't even limit yourself to the killing of journalists suspected of supporting Hamas.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Remind us all again where your post is condemning the attack and the rape and murder of hundreds of people attending a pop festival. I seem to have missed it.

The conflict did not begin on 7 October. It's been going on for decades.

 

[motorbiking]

The conflict did not begin on 7 October. It's been going on for decades.
It's Palestinians in their thousands that have borne the brunt of Israeli killing.
Nearly 400 of those killed on 7 October were military. Israel doesn't mention that. Israel also doesn't mention that they've been issuing arms, for free, to Israeli citizens. An armed civilian is a legitimate target.

Of the more than 22,000 Palestinians killed, just in the last three months, more than two thirds have been women and children.

So the Jews had it coming, right?

 

[Roy Bloom]

So you think the Jews had it coming?

Here we go again, resorting to absurd accusations.
Time and time and time again.

 

[JohnD]

So the Jews had it coming, right?

I'm surprised to see motorbiking thinks that.

What does it have to do with killing Journalists? Does he think all the murdered journalists were Jewish?

Or did he make a typing error, meaning to say "So the Journalists had it coming, right?" or "So the Palestinians had it coming, right?"

Either is more in line with his usual views.

 

[motorbiking]

Surely its a simple question?

 

[Roy Bloom]

JohnD pretends not to understand now. Make yourself a cup of tea and calm down a bit. It's not nice when people call you a racist and a liar, when you believe you are innocent. But count to 10 and you will be able to answer the question.

Following the attacks from Hamas on 7-oct which resulted in around 1200 people being killed and from an aggressor whose stated aim is to kill all jews and delete Isreal, an aggressor who's military capability is intertwined in civilian infrastructure and has who in doing so has declared war on Isreal. What is your advice to them?

Try not to answer it with a question or a statement on how interesting the question is.

The conflict did not begin on 7 October. It's been going on for decades.
It's Palestinians in their thousands that have borne the brunt of Israeli killing.
Nearly 400 of those killed on 7 October were military. Israel doesn't mention that. Israel also doesn't mention that they've been issuing arms, for free, to Israeli citizens. An armed civilian is a legitimate target.

Of the more than 22,000 Palestinians killed, just in the last three months, more than two thirds have been women and children.

I'm going to keep posting this every other post, because some keep forgetting it, or are intentionally ignoring it.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Surely its a simple question?

Are you still drinking your self silly?
Surely its a simple question?