D
Deleted member 221031
That’s convenientIt has all been censored and wiped from Yahoo.
That’s convenientIt has all been censored and wiped from Yahoo.
At the behest of the ruling lizards apparently. Or is it...That’s convenient
They know best.At the behest of the ruling lizards apparently. Or is it...
Or, it's official name, youareatube videos...Just those gut feelings and youtube videos
Do you have a list, or ideally a linkFunny how all the papers handed in all agreed. When it’s not accepted by thousands of scientists the world over.
So where are all the papers that don’t agree…..
What data? There are only two of the references in the document which can be read and both promote the idea of climate change.to be devastating the data was proving it wrong
Here is someone else asking to see the paper,Yep but what it is showing is even back then when they were saying climate change was manmade and going to be devastating the data was proving it wrong
please check your quotes before before posting"Policymaking should be guided by proved fact, not speculation. Most members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change believe that current climate models do not accurately portray the atmosphere-ocean system. Measurements made by means of satellites show no global warming but a cooling of 0.13°C between 1979 and 1994.5 Furthermore, since the theory of global warming assumes maximum warming at the poles, why have average temperatures in the Arctic dropped by 0.88°C over the past 50 years?2
.
Many climate change scientists do not agree that global warming is happening
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
If it's the article by Smith, mentioned in the editorial, it's linked to it in ¹It mentions a letter but doesn't link to it.
No, it was one science articleYep but what it is showing is even back then when they were saying climate change was manmade and going to be devastating the data was proving it wrong
I never realised the temperature of those long lorries were important.”average artic temps have dropped”