- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 803
- Country
Explain the differenceIt’s not the same thing is it! You’ve got a very strange view point.
Explain the differenceIt’s not the same thing is it! You’ve got a very strange view point.
£245 k flat renting for £1000 a month !I invite you to do the sums with a BtL mortgage of 6%.
A 245k flat renting for £1,000 per month with an additional £200-250 month maintenance, ground rent, building Insurance etc etc.
Having the same tenant for 10 years paying market rate is very rare.
Property prices have trebled in the 25 years.Don't forget that the landlord probably only had an interest only mortgage buy to let and at the end of the 25 year term they still owe the bank the 175k it cost to buy to pay off the loan. So the house may well be worth £245k now but that is not cash in the landlords pocket is it . Yes if they sell then the £70k is cash in the pocket but then they will still have to pay ££ capital gains tax on that which leaves them with £55,850. --Mean while the renter has not had to pay for new boilers, insulation, tests, regs, fences, which probably would mount up to £55k over 25 years---- You are better off renting.
Ok lets use that after capital gains tax you will have £117,907 if you sold - Not sure that was such a good investment £80k invested over 25 years so a gain of 38K = which is £1,520 per year.A house worth 245k today would have only cost around 80k back then.
So, if you took out a 25 year mortgage back then for an 80k property, you have around 160k in equity plus all the rental income today.
Not a bad return, better than premium bonds.
The Government hands out millions in student loans, millions are never repaid.oh I see so when you said "more fool the renter" how were you "judging every case differently"
Im not, Im in the fortunate position to have a mortgage free property
you are completely ignoring the fact the are a lot of people who simply cant save enough money to ever get on the housing ladder so they are stuck forever renting
Think you need to revisit your post 253, where you clearly say renters of 25 years.oh I see so when you said "more fool the renter" how were you "judging every case differently"
Im not, Im in the fortunate position to have a mortgage free property
you are completely ignoring the fact the are a lot of people who simply cant save enough money to ever get on the housing ladder so they are stuck forever renting
That just drives prices up. The reason property prices have eased is because mortgages are harder to get which has reduced demand.its ridiculous that people who for years have proved they can afford mortgage payments that would be far cheaper than their rent cannot get one .
About time stricter zero deposit mortgages where made more popular to help people out of rent trap
.
.
Stricter as in only for value of house and not thousands above the value as happened in the past
Calm down theres a good chap, you are angry
WRONG
childish point scoring
Go and have a cup of soothing tea and come back t apologise when youve calmed down
And he’s not good at it.It's pretty much all you do on here.
biggest concern with zero deposit is negative equity .That just drives prices up. The reason property prices have eased is because mortgages are harder to get which has reduced demand.
Which is not the fault of landlords, it's down to many factors that have resulted in fewer homes to live in that people want to live in.what is the point is that houses are now far more unaffordable, so less and less people get the opportunity to ever buy
Technically the landlord was in the right, though it's not an approach I'd take.I knew an old bloke who rented a house of a private landlord.
When the old bloke died suddenly, the landlord wanted rent paid up until the notice to quit period in the tenancy agreement expired.
The family of the deceased told the landlord to go and do one.
Now we're seeing why all the increase in red tape has been brought in to force the small landlord out.What has changed for landlords to be packing it in.