On ignore

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 294929
  • Start date Start date
Mottie said:
Then why are you talking about Brexit?
Click to expand...
I’m not

Bod put me on ignore because he couldn’t handle his silly nonsense about George Floyd being challenged.

I didn’t start comments about Brexit on this thread - I responded to Bod
 
Notch7 said:
excuses excuses excuses

you lost the argument on the George Floyd thread and you had a hissy fit.

you were the one that kept repeating the claim “he wasn’t a bent copper” - being bent had nothing whatsoever to do him being violent.
Click to expand...
Being impartial here, but "bent" means "corrupt", not "violent".
That's what @Bod ... was trying to make you understand.
You used the wrong word.
 
Notch7 said:
I’m not

Bod put me on ignore because he couldn’t handle his silly nonsense about George Floyd being challenged.

I didn’t start comments about Brexit on this thread - I responded to Bod
Click to expand...
You are. Your post that I quoted was your reply to carmanmemoranda. I don’t know what he said as he is on my ignore list but if he was talking about Brexit, there was no need for you to reply and continue with a discussion off-topic - two wrongs don’t make a right.

IMG_5902.jpeg


If you’re that obsessed by Brexit, why don’t you start your own thread on it, tell everyone how shìt you think it is (even though you voted for it) and keep it on topic?
 
Mottie said:
Your post that I quoted was in reply to carmanmemoranda. I don’t know what he said as he is on my ignore list but if he was talking about Brexit, there was no need for you to reply and continue with a discussion off-topic - two wrongs don’t make a right.

If you’re that obsessed by Brexit, why don’t you start your own thread on it, tell everyone how shìt you think it is (even though you voted for it) and keep it on topic?

View attachment 326586
Click to expand...
But two wrongens make a left.
 
johnny2007 said:
Being impartial here, but "bent" means "corrupt", not "violent".
That's what @Bod ... was trying to make you understand.
You used the wrong word.
Click to expand...
exactly: Bod was the one using the wrong word

he kept saying Derek Chauvin wasn’t “bent” - which has nothing to do with the case.
 
nwgs said:
So is Notchy in the wrong and Bod couldn’t be arsed arguing with a child again ?
Click to expand...
No

Bod is in the wrong.

Bod tried dishonestly claiming he had not seen anything that showed Derek Chauvin was “bent” ……which has FA to do with it

Chauvin had many previous complaints against him for being violent - so why was Bod trying to talk about him “not being bent”
 
nwgs said:
So is Notchy in the wrong and Bod couldn’t be arsed arguing with a child again ?
Click to expand...
I don't mind Notch but I believe him to be a Russian antagonist, and there is only so much
"He's behind you's" ''Oh no he's not's"
I can take
 
Mottie said:
You are. Your post that I quoted was your reply to carmanmemoranda. I don’t know what he said as he is on my ignore list but if he was talking about Brexit, there was no need for you to reply and continue with a discussion off-topic - two wrongs don’t make a right.

View attachment 326586

If you’re that obsessed by Brexit, why don’t you start your own thread on it, tell everyone how shìt you think it is (even though you voted for it) and keep it on topic?
Click to expand...
You can always tell when you’ve caught Notch out as he goes all quiet on the subject and stops replying to you. Like that time he made up lies about me saying that "all black families are thieves" but wouldn’t show me where I was supposed to have said it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top