No. Just building nous. And the reason many architects chose not to design extensions that are built right up to the boundaryGlass half empty
No. Just building nous. And the reason many architects chose not to design extensions that are built right up to the boundaryGlass half empty
It is rather sad that neighbours can't get together and agree a mutually beneficial arrangement. It is possible to build a parapet wall detail on the boundary or a tapered box gutter that doesn't allow rainwater run off to spill down the face of the wall.I think this is where the idea fails. Usually resulting in permanently wet or spalled or effloresced brickwork.
Not especially sad, but reflective of how combative or protective some folk are. Designers should not work on their own personal expectations.It is rather sad that neighbours can't get together and agree a mutually beneficial arrangement.
EDIT: And what exactly is anyone supposed to do in that 150mm gap. It is of no use to the OP or the neighbour so what is the point?
Semi detached and terraced houses are bought as just that, and no access along the boundary is needed for maintenance so that is a bit of an irrelevant reply.And yet that is exactly what the neighbour has done with his car port and fence and now expects the OP to leave a clear gap so he can have access?
How do we have semi detached houses and terraced houses if building up to the boundary is so problematic.
The OP should build up to the boundary. The design should ensure the wall requires no maintenance and has no overhang to cross the boundary to avoid potential disputes in the future. In fact my preferred option is, with the neighbour's agreement, to build astride the boundary so that the neighbour has the option to use the new party wall in the future if they wish.