It would have to fall faster than a stone, for the passengers to effectively fall slower, and hit the ceiling.
Not if the plane moved upwards - rapidly enough - first.
It would have to fall faster than a stone, for the passengers to effectively fall slower, and hit the ceiling.
Sorry, they don't. Lift and objects both fall with acceleration g.They most certainly do, if the vehicle drops like a stone, yes.
If an object is projected upwards, it experiences downward acceleration g at all times, not greater. That's why the velocity decreases till it's zero at maximum height, then increases as it falls back to the ground.Not if the plane moved upwards - rapidly enough - first.
Yes, it would have to be. That's what I was surmising in the original post.The plane isn't just falling, it can be pushed down a faster rate than that in certain circumstances.
Good point, maybe the front rows of seats get it, but not the back, or vice versa.I would hazard a guess more of a tail kick occurred could be wrong, the plane hitting turbulent air causing an oscillation affected more towards the rear of the plane, a sudden hump off air kicking the rear up and sharply down causing untethered passengers to accelerate towards lockers.
If an object is projected upwards, it experiences downward acceleration g at all times, not greater. That's why the velocity decreases till it's zero at maximum height, then increases as it falls back to the ground.
But the passenger wouldn't rise unless the plane was falling at greater than g, is the point I'm making. And it must be a big effect, to cause the damage it did, people's heads breaking overhead lockers etc.Not if the overhead lockers get in the way first..........
But the passenger wouldn't rise unless the plane was falling at greater than g,
The plane accelerating upwards first has nothing to do with it. If that happens, the passenger is pressed harder on to the seat.Of course they would.
Plane in level flight.
Passenger sitting happily, without lapbelt on.
Overhead locker is 1m above passenger's noggin.
Plane suddenly lurches upwards at 2g, for 1 second, then resumes level flight.
Plane has gone from 0m/s (vertically), to c. 20m/s (vertically) in 1s, then back to 0m/s.
The passenger does the same, except that they only go back to 0m/s when their head hits the overhead lockers.
what causes the downward acceleration? Downward air current most likely.
The plane accelerating upwards first has nothing to do with it. If that happens, the passenger is pressed harder on to the seat.
They just revert to putting their normal weight on the seat.And when the plane stops accelerating upwards?
What happens to the passenger?
If all the air suddenly disappears, the plane falls at g. If it goes into a black hole there are worse thinfs to worry about.Or no air current at all. A black hole.
They just revert to putting their normal weight on the seat.