When was cpc sleeving required?
When you say 'singles', do you mean single-insulated conductors in conduit or insulated+sheathed singles (or sheathed 'single+earth', such as we are discussing)?I don’t know if it’s a regional thing, but it certainly isn’t rare in my area. I’d say that most houses I go to are wired in singles up until maybe the early 90s when it seemed to fall out of favour. The property I was working in on Friday is wired in it.
Sorry I can't agree with this one, I was using green/yellow at school and I left there in 1972Between 1966 and 1977
1966 is when CPCs were first used on lighting circuits, and 1977 is when the colour for earth changed from green to green and yellow.
When you say 'singles', do you mean single-insulated conductors in conduit or insulated+sheathed singles (or sheathed 'single+earth', such as we are discussing)?
Kind Regards,
Sorry I can't agree with this one, I was using green/yellow at school and I left there in 1972
I added extra stage lighting sockets and I recall the 'odd job man' who also did the electrical bit and pieces asking what the green/yellow wires were for.Green and yellow was used in harmonised flex from 1970, but stayed green in fixed wiring until ‘77.
Interested. Single-sinsulated singles in conduit obviously make sense, but I wonder how the use of insulated+sheathed singles became popular/fashionable, at least in some parts of the country (as I said, it's not something that I have ever seen 'down south'), particularly given that it is presumably appreciably more expensive than twin or T+E?Insulated and sheathed single live or single live and earth.
Historically most rooms had one centre light, maybe when wall lights became more fashionable it was intended as an easy way to add a switchline.I wonder how the use of insulated+sheathed singles became popular/fashionable, at least in some parts of the country
Interested. Single-sinsulated singles in conduit obviously make sense, but I wonder how the use of insulated+sheathed singles became popular/fashionable, at least in some parts of the country (as I said, it's not something that I have ever seen 'down south'), particularly given that it is presumably appreciably more expensive than twin or T+E?
As I've said/implied, one concern I have about it is that it tempts one to use wiring practices which are far from ideal in terms of electromagnetic radiation.
Kind Regards, John
I would quess the 15th when Table 51A was introduced , which states identification for bare conductors for fixed wiring as G/Y.When was cpc sleeving required?
I'd have to think about that since my first reaction is to feel that there's not much copper to be saved in that way In any event, once CPCs came along, any such advantage would surely be largely (if not totally) cancelled by unnecessarily running at least two CPCs to every point in the circuit, wouldn't it?Generally wiring in singles will use less copper as you aren’t running an unnecessary permanent live to every pendant, or a neutral to every switch as you would with twin cabling.
Indeed, the 'old-fashioned' way of doing two-way light switching was another good way of generating EMI !I remember starting to use three core and earth as a new thing to try and reduce EMI.
As I've just written to RF, a good way of generating EMIThe way I’ve seen it used is to take a single from the rose to the first switch. ... Then a pair of strappers to the 2nd 2 way switch. Then a single from there back to the rose for SL