Trump. Jury have reached a decision.

[JonathanM]

you clearly havent followed it .
i will ask you a simple question if you did when did he find out what all the charges against him where

wrong try again all mentioned during the trial what the final charge was they would even tell trumps lawyers

After the jury retired to reach a verdict they came back to the judge questions see if you can find the judges reply amongst the millions of new links to the trial

I wasn't aware of these issues, because I've not been following the case very much. I've just done some Googling. Apparently everything is in order, just very complicated, so much so that even some legal experts struggled to follow it at first. It's not to do with the actual charges, but how the prosecution put all the different elements together to show how the charges were proved. This article explains it. I've only skimmed it! Because it was so complicated and confusing, various Trump supporters have been trying to spin it that something was amiss. But this article tries to explain that it actually wasn't.

Legal experts explain confusing jury instructions in Trump hush-money case

The prospect of a non-unanimous outcome has predictably resulted in substantial fanfare, attention, controversy, and complaints about what, exactly, the jury is being asked to do.

lawandcrime.com

 

[Notch7]

I've only skimmed it! Because it was so complicated and confusing, various Trump supporters have been trying to spin it that something was amiss.

gas112 for example

 

[blup]

Very wise and statesmanlike address from Bidenn just now…

 

[JonathanM]

An interesting article in the Telegraph. Basically saying that Trump is a nightmare client for a lawyer. His insistence on denying everything, rather than letting his legal team take apart the prosecution case forensically, led to his conviction. If he tries this in the other cases, he is toast.

How Trump’s defence team made a fatal mistake

With three more pending trials against him, the former president should think of a better strategy than ‘deny everything’

www.telegraph.co.uk

 

[Brigadier]

An interesting article in the Telegraph. Basically saying that Trump is a nightmare client for a lawyer. His insistence on denying everything, rather than letting his legal team take apart the prosecution case forensically, led to his conviction. If he tries this in the other cases, he is toast.

How Trump’s defence team made a fatal mistake

With three more pending trials against him, the former president should think of a better strategy than ‘deny everything’

www.telegraph.co.uk

Narcissist.
He can't conceive of the notion that he isn't the centre of the universe.

The irony being, he's a total tw@t

 

[IT Minion]

An interesting article in the Telegraph. Basically saying that Trump is a nightmare client for a lawyer. His insistence on denying everything, rather than letting his legal team take apart the prosecution case forensically, led to his conviction. If he tries this in the other cases, he is toast.

How Trump’s defence team made a fatal mistake

With three more pending trials against him, the former president should think of a better strategy than ‘deny everything’

www.telegraph.co.uk

His lawyer was explaining that Trump likes to be intimately involved in choosing arguments and approaches. Since he's senile and napped through the trial that isn't a good idea

I suspect the worst bit about Trump is that you've got a very poor chance of getting paid. There's a reason he's scraping the bottom of the barrel on lawyers these days.

 

[JonathanM]

Narcissist.
He can't conceive of the notion that he isn't the centre of the universe.

The irony being, he's a total tw@t

His press conference this afternoon was unwatchable. Just one endless, pathetic whinge. Rightly, it's been universally panned.