When is this going to stop?

many years ago a friends mum was bitten on her hand by their old and manky looking toy poodle called claude. She died a week later due to an infection from that bite. Any dog that bites should be euthanised.
 
Brigadier said:
Cars are not, because they have an overriding primary function, that is not to threaten, maim, or kill.
Click to expand...
I get that but if we are going to legislate/ban everything that may be harmful I don't know where we'd stop.
Brigadier said:
the law is only observed by decent folk.
Click to expand...
Then do away with the un-decent ones? I'm joking of course.
 
denso13 said:
I get that but if we are going to legislate/ban everything that may be harmful I don't know where we'd stop.
Click to expand...

Such dogs are not so much "harmful", as evidently lethal.

Plus, do something before it gets too big an issue to deal with?
 
Think people forget why some dogs were bred for

To take an extreme example

Afaik a Neapolitan Mastiff was bred by the Romans to fight and kill people in the arena ??
 
Brigadier said:
The only safe dog is a non - existent one.

Failing that, small enough to stand a chance against.
Click to expand...
The only safe motorised vehicle is a non-existent one.

But they are allowed, with concessions.

So could dogs be.
 
securespark said:
The only safe motorised vehicle is a non-existent one.

But they are allowed, with concessions.

So could dogs be.
Click to expand...

ALL MOTORISTS VEHICLES ARE SAFE.
It is the presence of drivers that makes some not so.



You cannot ever say the same for something with a mind of its own.
Such as a dog.



Nothing you can say will make me reconsider my OP.
 
This is my point that you obviously disagree with.

Humans must be in charge of their vehicles or their dogs at all times.

If they cannot, they should not have them.
 
Notch7 said:
No they aren’t

A very small dog can’t kill a fully grown man

A very small dog would be able to kill a defenceless baby but not much else
Click to expand...
So you don't class a 'defenceless baby' as a person then?

Notch7 said:
Go on then

I guarantee you don’t have the answer
Click to expand...
Ban all but working/caring dogs...

Notch7 said:
You don’t have a dog so you have zero clue what a wonderful addition they make to a family

Luckily most people aren’t narrow minded like you.
Click to expand...
Grew up with parents who had dogs...

Never to be trusted, and we chose to put our kids above pack animals...

We preferred to think of our kids as the 'wonderful additions' to our family...

Luckily we aren't as stupid as you!
 
securespark said:
The only safe motorised vehicle is a non-existent one.

But they are allowed, with concessions.

So could dogs be.
Click to expand...
With concessions?

You mean like cars on roads and people on pavements?

Dogs are allowed to co-exist/harass people on said pavements...

Maybe we could have 'dog lanes' as a 'concession' to the pack animals? ;)
 
fillyboy said:
So, even the family dog didn't like you.
Click to expand...
Other way around actually...

But then you seem to prefer pack animals to people...

I really like fireworks...

Payback time ;)

So would you rather ban dogs or fireworks?
 
ellal said:
Other way around actually...

But then you seem to prefer pack animals to people...

I really like fireworks...

Payback time ;)

So would you rather ban dogs or fireworks?
Click to expand...

My cat harry does not mind fire works totally unfazed by bangs

He did a stint in dire ear a Stan so it’s normal :giggle:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top