One would only choose to use bricks (if yo didn't need to) if size match were essential.
Not necessarily no. There are instances where intense load bearing masonry structures would need to be built brick only. There are locations where the masonry needs to be 'tolerant' i.e. below DPC. The inspector only need to be convinced that masonry adheres to sub DPC standards whether that be block or brick.Would there ever be a case where a building inspector would stipulate their use?
Not as much as building a roof (timber structure and the tiling).blocks ruin your fingernails
I wouldn't be too concerned about them using bricks instead of blocks so much as what the quality of the facework above DPC is going to be like.Would there ever be a case where a building inspector would stipulate their use?
Me neither. Just curious especially when you look at the external bricklaying.I wouldn't be too concerned about them using bricks instead of blocks
Wear marigolds, silly.blocks ruin your fingernails
Oh Lordy. Brickies hate having to take brickwork down.
So we will be telling the builder to take it down tomorrow.
NO.The question is, would you allow him to put it back up
Thanks everyone for all your input.
So we will be telling the builder to take it down tomorrow. The question is, would you allow him to put it back up with a better matching brick, if the bricklaying is as bad as it seems?