Angela Rayner

denso13 said:
So, just to recap.

It isn't a police matter.
Nobody knows if HMRC are interested.
It could have been a genuine mistake with only a few thousand pounds involved.
She could be right and her advice that she has done nothing wrong is correct, therefore she owes nothing.

How many hundreds of millions are we up to with the Rwanda con?
Click to expand...
except she continues to deny it.
- denies living at her hubby's despite social media posts
- denies renting her home out despite reports from her neighbours
- denies owing any CGT because it was her home

it would have all gone away had she admitted making an error.
 
motorbiking said:
except she continues to deny it.
- denies living at her hubby's despite social media posts
- denies renting her home out despite reports from her neighbours
- denies owing any CGT because it was her home

it would have all gone away had she admitted making an error.
Click to expand...
Hearsay then
 
motorbiking said:
except she continues to deny it.
- denies living at her hubby's despite social media posts
- denies renting her home out despite reports from her neighbours
- denies owing any CGT because it was her home

it would have all gone away had she admitted making an error.
Click to expand...

motorbiking said:
. I personally think it was an oversight/misunderstanding.
Click to expand...

you seem confused
 
JonathanM said:
To investigate whether she told the truth on social media? That sounds like a waste of resources!
Click to expand...

www.theguardian.com

Police review decision not to investigate Angela Rayner after Tory complaint

MP James Daly asked Greater Manchester police to examine claims Labour’s deputy leader did not declare main residence accurately
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

The police are reviewing a decision not to investigate Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner, over claims she may have broken electoral law.

The move to “reassess” a decision not to launch an investigation earlier this month was confirmed by Greater Manchester police (GMP) on Wednesday after a complaint by the Conservative MP James Daly about the force’s handling of the issue.


Daly, the Conservative deputy chair, had originally asked the force to investigate after Rayner had faced questions for weeks over whether she was liable to pay capital gains tax (CGT) on the sale of her former council house before she became an MP.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ue-of-angela-rayner-selling-her-council-house
She has denied any wrongdoing relating to where she was registered as living after her marriage in 2010.

The complaint to police from Daly followed claims made in a book by the former Tory deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft, which suggested that she had failed to properly declare her main residence.

Rayner insists a property in Vicarage Road, Stockport, which she sold in 2015 for a reported £48,500 profit before she entered parliament, was her “principal property” despite her then partner living elsewhere at the time.

Government guidance says tenants can apply to buy their council home through the right-to-buy scheme if it is their “only or main home”. HMRC rules state married couples or civil partners can only count one property as their primary residence.

However, while GMP said earlier this month that Rayner would not face investigation, Daly wrote again to suggest that relevant witness or documents had not been considered.

He received a reply from Cheryl Hughes, a detective chief inspector, who said she had read a letter from him “outlining your concern over the lack of investigation into the matters you raised in your initial complaints to GMP”.

“Following receipt of your recent letter dated 13 March 2024, I have been requested to review the circumstances you have outlined to reassess our decision around an investigation. I will update with the outcome.”


A GMP spokesperson said on Wednesday: “We have received a complaint regarding our decision not to investigate an allegation and are in the process of reassessing this decision. The complainant will be updated with the outcome of the reassessment in due course.”
 
S
motorbiking said:
except she continues to deny it.
- denies living at her hubby's despite social media posts
- denies renting her home out despite reports from her neighbours
- denies owing any CGT because it was her home
Click to expand...
So when does she get prosecuted, or chased by HMRC?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top