Another Angela Rayner scandal

Mottie said:
:unsure: Is it just me that thinks the first post has got absolutely feck all to do with the thread tittle - Angela Rayner? Has JohnD had to stoop so low as to create threads under false pretences? Is he confusing his posts on here with his posts on Facebook or Tik Tok.
Click to expand...
It's a way of making sure mbk and other tory stalwarts read it, and respond.

Their responses are interesting don't you think.

You have noticed the same attacking comments over this scandal haven't you ?
 
It seems the Tory bloke phones some one up and said he had got in with bad people and needed £5000 and someone found £6500 for him paid back via campaign funds.

:) Maybe the bad people were the ERG
 
carmanmemoranda said:
Their responses are interesting don't you think.

You have noticed the same attacking comments over this scandal haven't you ?
Click to expand...

There does seem to be a fair amount of Rayner Derangement Syndrome. Tory MPs need to realise that her bark is far worse than her bite. The worst she will do is growl at them a bit. Deep down, I think they actually like it.
 
Mottie said:
:unsure: Is it just me that thinks the first post has got absolutely feck all to do with the thread tittle - Angela Rayner? Has JohnD had to stoop so low as to create threads under false pretences? Is he confusing his posts on here with his posts on Facebook or Tik Tok.
Click to expand...

It's to get our attention. But the Authors name does give the game away a bit.
 
blup said:
No the times has been sitting on it, murdock is showing starmy how he can be of assistance. There will be a lot more if keith behaves himself
Click to expand...
Thats a ridiculous argument.

If the Times were helping Starmer they would have released this 2 weeks ago to deflect from Angela Rayner.

The reality is the Times have been sitting on it to give Conservatives time to destroy any evidence and align their bullsh1t story.

Seriously Blup you are twisting yourself inside out to turn anything you can think of to turn it against Starmer

BTW calling Keir Starmer “Keith” shows you up as a Corbyn cultist. It’s the childish nonsense that is spouted by Sqwawkbox etc.
 
Notch7 said:
Thats a ridiculous argument.

If the Times were helping Starmer they would have released this 2 weeks ago to deflect from Angela Rayner.
Click to expand...
The timing is perfect, and deflects from AR as you suggest
Notch7 said:
The reality is the Times have been sitting on it to give Conservatives time to destroy any evidence and align their bullsh1t story.

Seriously Blup you are twisting yourself inside out to turn anything you can think of to turn it against Starmer

BTW calling Keir Starmer “Keith” shows you up as a Corbyn cultist. It’s the childish nonsense that is spouted by Sqwawkbox etc.
Click to expand...
It echoes new labour getting into power in the 90's on the back of sleaze (back then sleaze was paying cash for an MP to ask a question in parliament, how times have changed). Karma Starma is literally copying the strategy, what goes round comes around.
 
blup said:
The timing is perfect, and deflects from AR as you suggest

It echoes new labour getting into power in the 90's on the back of sleaze (back then sleaze was paying cash for an MP to ask a question in parliament, how times have changed). Karma Starma is literally copying the strategy, what goes round comes around.
Click to expand...
Are you trying to blame starmer for Tory sleaze?
 
blup said:
He's adopting their policies not their sleaze
Click to expand...
Like he adopted their policy to tax non-doms?

Oh no.

That was them copying him.

How about renationalising sewage companies?
 
blup said:
The timing is perfect, and deflects from AR as you suggest
Click to expand...
You are just making up a connection with Starme because you don’t like him

Angela Rayner story was at the height of the news cycle 2 weeks ago
The timing is not perfect at all


It’s obvious the Conservative activists involved in the story got fed up with Conservative Party doing nothing about it so they went to the Times.

The Times were so obviously in contact with Tory press office to agree a time for release. Times went live with story about 9.00pm, MP had whip removed by midnight - that shows Tory party knew in advance.


So Murdochs paper collaborates with Tories not Starmer.
 
blup said:
It echoes new labour getting into power in the 90's on the back of sleaze (back then sleaze was paying cash for an MP to ask a question in parliament, how times have changed). Karma Starma is literally copying the strategy, what goes round comes around.
Click to expand...
That’s just being silly.

Every opposition party since the beginning of time challenges the govt on any wrongdoing


Seriously Blup, you are making yourself look a fool, you are picking anything and applying it to Starmer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top