Another person who is obsessed with me because I got the better of them in a discussion. Calm down, dear. Just try better next time.
Climate: The Movie
- Thread starter berty3000
- Start date
- Status
Another person who is obsessed with me because I got the better of them in a discussion. Calm down, dear. Just try better next time.
JonathanM is in a different league to you
if you were a wise man you would listen to people like JonathanM and Wobs
rate of warming is the proof
It has been much warmer before, no problem to life on earth. Do you comprehend?
What difference does the rate of increase make? Not that you know what the rate of increase is now or what it was then.
Go on, go and dig out a hockey stick graph to "prove" whatever it is you're trying to say.
You clearly know nothing about me. Unlike some sad keyboard warriors, I don't measure my self-worth by "winning" an argument in an online forum. I much prefer a decent discussion.
I was intrigued, though, when reading this thread, by someone who joins a forum and is immediately so obnoxious. That generally takes a little while. It suggest a certain familiarity. Other forum members are often much better than me at recognising returnees.
Does anyone remember an aggressive, supercilious, verbose and pedantic right wing poster from before?
I can think of anyone specific, but weve seen a few like over the years
Bettys MO does seem familiar
You've not heard of the "end-Permian extinction", have you?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Yes, but mine are based on scientific research and yours are gut feelings. Don't pretend they are even remotely the same.
Are you, even qualified, to make such a judgement?
What makes you assume, that I haven't done the very same evaluation of the research, yet arrived at an entirely opposite conclusion?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Almost 100% of scientific papers on the subject support the notion of man made climate change.
How did your interpretation of the science come up with a different view? What bits of their research are wrong?
I thought I made clear, I am not entering into any discussion of my personal conclusions on this subject? Unlike some, I do have more productive things to do, suffice to say, I remain unconvinced that global warming is due to man's action, or that we can do anything useful to slow, or prevent it. There is far too much financial interest in the idea of global warming, for there to be a reversal now, or a change of mind.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Fine, I don't know why you ask questions of me an expect an answer in that case.
Hey, you seem alright - I especially like your written style, particularly the last paragraph
I'm sorry we got off on the wrong foot. I haven't posted here before as a different user. I'd happily say if I had.100% funded to do so. Quelle surprise.
And mostly a load of guesswork and modelling.
"Mm... so we made the following 300 assumptions, ran the cherry picked data from a favourable period between 9:25 and 10:15 on April 7th, then voila: Global boiling is real!"
Are you a gullible person in general or just on this particular subject?
- Status