Congratulations sir kier

I'd be happy to pay no tax and pay for every single thing I consumed from the state. I’d be significantly better off. Would you?
Nope.

If I lived in the good ol' US of A, I'd be dead, at least twice over.

Although you could argue that people like me with a birth injury due to a mismanaged delivery should get any subsequent care that is required free from the provider, in cases where they paid for that service, as a bare minimum.
 
But some like you, want others to pay more so that you can benefit from their hard work.

I’d be happy to pay no tax and pay for every single thing I consumed from the state. I’d be significantly better off. Would you?

Who is going to provide the countries defence and how do you work that out? Who is going to pay for public goods? Clean rivers? Clean air?

Cool so we will need to cost and invoice everything, travel on the road, pay per mile, clean air - pay per ltr etc Yeah would be admin nightmare - please don't say AI and tech will solve it.

You really are having an Ayn Rand wet dream - before you get too worked up read up about transaction costs and that will put your Ayn Rand fantasy to bed if you have a functioning brain.

So in your world there can't be insurance as that is pooling risk.

Do us all a favour and leave to whichever third world country suits you - Rwanda?
 
In a country with no courts and no police force, motorbiking might lose his wealth at any time.

Haiti might suit him. Or Gaza. Perhaps he will sail his boat past Somalia.
 
Health care UK
Problems not mentioned too much pressure, bullying, overwork and a number of etc. We are behind on modern gear again.There is one simple common reason. The country is not making enough money in the right way to support itself adequately. There are lots of what are essentially none productive jobs around. LOL I always remember a comment by a Tory when the changes were made. You can't run a country by selling each other hamburgers. Well we've been trying and the general problem has got worse rather than better.

Health care France - oh - it's paid for several ways including taxation.
Hang on why does it mention long waits? Many take out insurance as well as all costs may not be covered. One aspect of that is that if someone finds they need it that's too late. In an extreme way might be best to obtain it while in the womb. The age it's taken out has an effect. If there is previous health information around it wont cover any related problems.

The French also add a number of up front charges. An idea that has been toyed with here but only applied in one case. Dentists. The results didn't work out. Waiting rooms empty. The charge went up. Slowly the NHS treatments in this area have been made cheaper and cheaper in terms of solutions but they are still costly. I had a dentist that was very keen on the NHS. Fine but say you wanted a crown the cheapest possible type eventually gets used. Still costs and actually isn't all that short of private. Also something that has caused me lots of grief. Rules. I have a problem that goes way back due to a dentist having a bad day and more recently a new bloke that did something unwise. Interesting one that. Gov suggesting that dentists are all set up for some work so do some preventative work as well. It's cheaper.
 
You can't run a country by selling each other hamburgers.

But you can "grow" its economy, doing that: that's where the last shower's "growth" figures kept coming from.

Growing an economy means investing, in education and everything that supports it, from grassroots-level and from day one.
Not by cutting everything - pulling up the ladder behind you - and not by denying those who follow the opportunities and assistances that you benefitted from.
 
I always remember a comment by a Tory when the changes were made. You can't run a country by selling each other hamburgers.

Was that a comment on the Conservatives' Thatcherite policy of destroying industry and encouraging a service economy?
 
I think it was along the lines of "We can't all work for Morrisons" and yes, putting too much reliance on services is at the root of this.
 
Motorbiking wants to live in a country without properly funded public services.

Public health?

Weights and measures?

Accident prevention?

Food standards?

Road safety?

In other news today:

"Chinese authorities have opened an investigation into cooking oil shipments after a local media report alleged that fuel tankers had been used to carry edible oil without being cleaned, setting off the latest food safety scandal in the country.

An undercover video by state-backed Beijing News last week showed numerous fuel tanker trucks carried cooking oil, with one driver calling it an “open secret” in the industry that truckers didn’t clean their tanks when switching between hauling toxic and edible liquids.

“I haul sugar, honey, molasses, cooking oil, motor lubricant,” another driver said in the video. “I haul everything.” A third truck driver said he usually did not pay the Rmb400-500 ($55-69) to wash his truck’s tank before changing cargo."

FT.com

Motorbiking sneers at serious press media.
 
Was that a comment on the Conservatives' Thatcherite policy of destroying industry and encouraging a service economy?
Yes, It's an implication of the changes. Fine for some city functions if it gains from other countries. Past that it's not an easy thing to look at but that is the main aspect. Futures for instance - gains are purely off us. The source gets it's money. Is that productive?

Mrs T - she was over the moon that some Japanese car companies came here. Best hope they stay and do try and get work actually done here. MG China - kit car company = far far fewer jobs. Moni's BMW made an effort. Some US have at times but have also moved stuff out.
 
Last edited:
I see the angry socialists are being angry socialists again. It's nice to see the extremes and straw man arguments brought out to support their socialist tropes.

Its convenient to pretend we only have a choice between Belgium and Guatemala and ignore the wide spectrum in between. Tax is not the ticket to civilised society and we don't need to import lots of low paid people who will compete with existing low paid people, in order to provide for our aging population.
 
see the angry socialists are being angry socialists again. It's nice to see the extremes and straw man arguments brought out to support their socialist tropes.
LOL If that's aimed at me do bear in mind that the Tory have pointed out that the economy is out of balance. I've just pointed out the sort of thing they mean. Ok I chose cars but so what. I could also mention supply chains. Parts various things need.

Another issue with our experiences relates to growth we may have got. It may not relate to our productivity levels. In fact it can help some other countries.
 
Back
Top