More evidence that face to face is better than online:Blah, blah, blah...
More people than you can talk with online?
Nonsense.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/br...f-being-there/
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insight...te-fewer-ideasResearch shows face-to-face requests are 34 times more effective than those sent by email, and that a physical handshake promotes cooperation and influences negotiation outcomes for the better.
MIT’s Human Dynamics Lab spent hundreds of hours tracking performance drivers across industries by collecting data from electronic badges that covered everything from tone of voice to body language. The results showed unequivocally that the most valuable communication is done in-person, and that typically 35 percent of the variation in a given team’s performance was explained by the number of times team members actually spoke face-to-face.
Even my own experience backs this up. I have attended the same conference regularly in person, and online. In person, I can chat to people afterwards, network etc. On line, I am basically a viewer of a presentation, and can ask questions during the presentation, and that's about it.The study, coauthored by Jonathan Levav of Stanford Graduate School of Business and Melanie Brucks of Columbia Business School, finds that in-person teams generated more ideas than remote teams working on the same problem.
In a laboratory experiment conducted at Stanford, half the teams worked together in person and half did so online. The in-person teams generated 15% to 20% more ideas than their virtual counterparts. In a separate experiment involving almost 1,500 engineers at a multinational corporation, in-person teams came up with more ideas, and those ideas received higher ratings for originality.
Although I've never had to fly to a conference, even when it was about decarbonisation.