Cop 28

Blah, blah, blah...


More people than you can talk with online?
Nonsense.
More evidence that face to face is better than online:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/br...f-being-there/
Research shows face-to-face requests are 34 times more effective than those sent by email, and that a physical handshake promotes cooperation and influences negotiation outcomes for the better.

MIT’s Human Dynamics Lab spent hundreds of hours tracking performance drivers across industries by collecting data from electronic badges that covered everything from tone of voice to body language. The results showed unequivocally that the most valuable communication is done in-person, and that typically 35 percent of the variation in a given team’s performance was explained by the number of times team members actually spoke face-to-face.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insight...te-fewer-ideas
The study, coauthored by Jonathan Levav of Stanford Graduate School of Business and Melanie Brucks of Columbia Business School, finds that in-person teams generated more ideas than remote teams working on the same problem.

In a laboratory experiment conducted at Stanford, half the teams worked together in person and half did so online. The in-person teams generated 15% to 20% more ideas than their virtual counterparts. In a separate experiment involving almost 1,500 engineers at a multinational corporation, in-person teams came up with more ideas, and those ideas received higher ratings for originality.
Even my own experience backs this up. I have attended the same conference regularly in person, and online. In person, I can chat to people afterwards, network etc. On line, I am basically a viewer of a presentation, and can ask questions during the presentation, and that's about it.

Although I've never had to fly to a conference, even when it was about decarbonisation.
 
That's why the OPEC executives decided to send a letter to the conference, i suppose.
 
That's why the OPEC executives decided to send a letter to the conference, i suppose.
Sending a letter to a conference for general distribution is very different to 'networking'.
 
Sure, but the Darkside of all that networking are lobbyists conspiring to work against the Climate Change agenda agreed, in principle, by attending delgates on behalf of nation states. Everyone wants to pass the buck. Nobody is prepared to do any more than they have to.
 
Sure, but the Darkside of all that networking are lobbyists conspiring to work against the Climate Change agenda agreed, in principle, by attending delgates on behalf of nation states. Everyone wants to pass the buck. Nobody is prepared to do any more than they have to.
Sure, networking can be a force for good as well as the opposite (bad, wrong, poor, immoral, etc).
 
Certainly happened over the last week or so before the winds finally picked up.
What fuel did we have to rely on to back that up with.
Best have some of that on standby if the report is to be believed or on the other hand retreat to a cave.

 
Global warming blimey go and talk to some ordinary Greenlander who has been living on a diet of seal meat

Some of them can now grow strawberry’s and vegetables in there gardens

Yes exactly one of the up sides to global warming
 
Best have some of that on standby if the report is to be believed or on the other hand retreat to a cave.

Will you have room in there for all of us, old spink? :mrgreen:
 
With the amount of contrarians on here I don't think that would be wise.
Probably all starve to death arguing what to have for dinner.
 
Last edited:
With the amount of contrarians on here I don't think that would be wise.
Probably all starve to death arguing what to have for dinner.
You don't consider yourself as one?
I'll have the veggie burger with a side order of fries.
 
Certainly happened over the last week or so before the winds finally picked up.
What fuel did we have to rely on to back that up with.
Best have some of that on standby if the report is to be believed or on the other hand retreat to a cave.

Wind is part of the energy mix including solar and nuclear.

climate change deniers always spout nonsense about wind being unreliable.
 
With the amount of contrarians on here I don't think that would be wise.
Probably all starve to death arguing what to have for dinner.
You are the contrarian.

just because your posts are devoid of facts or evidence, don’t try and drag others down to your level
 
Wind is part of the energy mix including solar and nuclear.

climate change deniers always spout nonsense about wind being unreliable.
Already discussed at length over here... don't let him change the subject otherwise we'll be going round in circles again.
 
You are the contrarian.

just because your posts are devoid of facts or evidence, don’t try and drag others down to your level
or even up to their level...:unsure:
Just because you do not agree with popular opinion doesn't always put you in the wrong.
 
Back
Top